User talk:Cowardly Line

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Walter Mondale, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''It would be wise to not continue to edit war as that is a major violation on Wikipedia. I suggest you start a discussion here or on Mondale's talk page. I am willing to have a conversation with you, but you continue to edit war, you will be reported.'' ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Last attempt at resolution

 * I am willing to have a passive conversation with you, but you continue to edit war, you will be reported for your behavior. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 15:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Walter Mondale shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Dude, if anyone is doing an edit war, it's you. Moreover, the policy you refer to about images says to "strive for variety." What you are doing on Walter Mondale's article is just plain silly.

Response from my talk page
You know it takes two editors to make a edit war. And I'm not the one ignoring multiple attempts at resolution and having a discussion. It took over 5 messages from me to get a response from you. And I know your not away from the computer as you continue to revert my eidts. It is disruptive to edit war over a page, point blank period. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I've responded to every one of your messages and looked up the policy about images you mentioned, which doesn't say what you say it says. I've tried to reason with you. If I should be blocked, you should too.