User talk:Cowboybebop98

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com'. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

jin jing
There is no neutrality problem now. I will remove the NPOV tag.--Jingandteller (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry you removed my explanation. And I am a real Canadian, just like you are a real fenqing. Cheers. Yunfeng (talk) 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I am sorry how the truth hurt you. Something can not be changed. If making a serious (but false) statement can make like you are a real white person, i promise i won't remove it. Take care (Cowboybebop98 (talk) 20:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC))


 * Thanks! :) Yunfeng (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

How about we stop the passive-aggressive attacks and dedicate our editing to present the topic in the most WP:NPOV manner as possible? It's not difficult. Assume any and all sources are biased, and present opposing and different sides of the story. Let the reader judge for himself or herself what to believe. Thanks. (And in case anybody is wondering, I've disagreed with both Jingandteller and Yunfeng on certain issues.) Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, and thanks. (Cowboybebop98 (talk) 22:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC))

Thank you very much for being reasonable. I really appreciate that. This is not really relevant to anything, but I think you should look at some Chinese articles about her and consider whether or not the story is being used as propaganda objectively, completely aside from what anyone says about it in the "Western" media. Thanks again for taking the time to consider the issues. Yunfeng (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. I just tried not to be unreasonable. Thank your for all the discussions. (Cowboybebop98 (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC))

thanks
thanks.--Jingandteller (talk) 16:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * NP, :-) --Cowboybebop98 (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

3RR and Jin Jing
If you would look closely at what I actually changed and what not you would see that I did not violate WP:3RR, but only WP:2RR. I am also wondering, given that you are here only since a few days and take an exclusive interest in just one article, whether you are familiar with WP:SOCK. Cheers, Novidmarana (talk) 17:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link. I have been wondering if there is a English equivalent for what we called "Ma Jia" in Chinese. If you are suspicious about the use of sock puppet accounts, feel free to report to the community. As for the revert, I suggest you to take another good look at the definition in 3RR. Take care --Cowboybebop98 (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * On a related note, I would invite anybody who is concerned to watch a youtube video that i made called "Tribute to JinJing: Smiling Olympic Angel In Wheelchair", I discovered this article as a side effect of an attempt to find out who was watching my video through google. (Cowboybebop98 (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC))

POV
I agree to remove the POV tag. Thanks.--Jingandteller (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bchinatravelguide\.com\b'.

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:hi
I know. It would be really stupid to have something against somebody you don't even know. I'm glad you cleared that up though; but I wasn't suspecting you at all. Wikipedia is all about a collaboration effort, and that includes a lot of debating, which may seem unfriendly at times. --haha169 (talk) 23:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your recent revert on Sichuan Earthquake
The section that I removed is considered controversial and I have moved it to talk page for further discussion. This was clearly stated in my edit summary. So I don' think it is a unconstructive edit. Please provide more information other than just a template next time you tried to push the button. (Cowboybebop98 (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC))
 * Reversion of vandalism is in this case indeed simply pushing a button, which also issues a standard template. I agree that in thise case somewhat clearer information is a good idea.


 * The edit the user made might be controversial, but i disagree that it should be removed from the article simply because it is controversial. As far as i can conclude the edit is more then properly sourced, which means that it should be allowed to remain around. In case you do disagree, i would suggest tagging the section with a   tag and raise an issue on the talk page as opposed to simply removing or moving the section. This way more people will be able to join the debate, as there is a clear signal something is amiss, as opposed to randomly moving to the talk page.


 * Kind regards, Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 20:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)