User talk:Cowgummi

Delayed replies
Replying to comments made 8 years ago, as you did at Talk:Casino‎, are best avoided. Most editors will ignore these comments since the discussion died long ago. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

My comment is still topical, what is my best approach to reviving the topic? I assume the discussion that has died should be archived and a new one opened.--Cowgummi (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Poker
Hi. I guess we met on, where I suggested I could check the article you want promoted to B-class for its grammar and style (judging by your contributions to the article, you are blq1, right?). I'm leaving this message to notify you that as promised, I have done it; I corrected any problems I spotted (and they were all minor) and I think the article does not have any major grammatical errors. This has been recorded on the article's talk page.  smt cha hal  talk 03:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of La Relance


The article La Relance has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Maybe the book is notable (if reviews can be found). Nothing at present suggests this game variant is notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)