User talk:Cowmadness

Guidelines for posting on my talk page
Do Not Comment anonymously from IP's!

otherwise deletion of your input may follow

You are not allowed to use profanity on this page

You have to deal with the consequences if you do.

Criticism is welcome but has to remain objective, on topic and within a friendly tone

Regards Cowmadness (talk) 12:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Wise Words:

First I would like to congratulate the author of this article and I add my voice to him.

I wonder that the survivals of the Holocaust are able to do the same against this poor palestinian folk ( M K ).

Tera
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography/Archive 3. Epbr123 (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Thank you, OH mighty sinebot for this helpful notice ! I really got smarter by now...again Thank You XD--Cowmadness (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * BTW, you still don't sign your posts. Its really easy, just press the button. We all do it. Nothing hard.--Cerejota (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well Cerejota, There is a special Bot called sign bot to remind ppl to sign the posts


 * you don't need to waste my time and yours doing that


 * But thanks Anyway ;pCowmadness (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Your message in my talk
Say hello to Jimmy when you talk with him. Tell him the flowers were lovely, but I rather have some of the speaking fees :D.--Cerejota (talk) 21:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Asking for your opinion
As i see this become a heated debate for many I just wanted to pop in and ask as many people about thier comments as I can. Please reply back to me but I ask you do it in a repectful manor as I will do for you.

I take no sides on this nor do i intend to. I do have my own opinion on what has caused this situation but the thing is it is my opionin I do seek to discover in the end, but I seek to understand the views of all to find my opinion.

So here goes:

You wrote "But Here, We see nothing like it ! What we see , is a brutal and indescriminent murder against the people of Gaza. of course israel claims it targets hamas but these are only lies and propaganda , from the death toll and from the unreasonable amount of aggression and hate that this act was carried out , clearly displays the Zionist Intention to exterminate every single arab palestinian from the lands of palestine"

I would like to know more about this opinion. It sounds to me the Isreali's could have done some really bad stuff here, but also as a soldier myself in my country's military I can't say the actions of another military is bad without evidence.

You say it is an act of Murder? I truely hope not. I would hate to think anyone would do something of the sort but I know it happens. Where could I find hard fact that the Isreali government and military set out with the intentions of murdering as many people as they can? and if they did why didn't they just attack the biggest most populas buildings as they could?

I am not saying they did or don't do these things I am looking for cold hard statitical fact on this.

Thank you for your time.MathewDill (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

The Zionist Speaks
Some unknown zionist said: Wikipedia is not your pulpit ,I understand you feel srongly about Israel, that is what political forums are for, you don't have to try to dirty up Wikipedia with your POV. Consider that you might not be infallible, and therefore you may be wrong, I don't mean to offend you but you really need to get off your high horse and consider others, if you feel you are worth considering. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.179.202.129 (talk) 08:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Well Wikipedia is the Pulpit of everybody, that's what this website is for.

However, Your proposal to me that i should withdraw my attitude against this facist-like regime that is called israel, Is completely propesterous devoid of any sense of rationality. What's the alternative mentality ? To Embrace the zionist terror regime and overflood it with money, armor and weapons ? So that it can continue it's atrocities????

Never!

Thank you any way for your futile attempt, but i Have to decline.

Regards

another unknown zionist said: I don't expect you to change your opinion of Israel, I only expect you to consider that the purpose of this site is objective information, not your opinions of how horrible Israel is, and your perceived notions of what we want to do to arabs, or our lack of right to defend ourselves. I don't mind that you don't like Israel, but I do mind that you try to force your opinion on others. Well, first all remember that i don't allow comments from ip's on my talk area, but i'm gonna let it pass once.
 * Wikipedia isn't the pulpit of everyone, it's the pulpit of no one, it strives to be objective.

Let me tell you something, Please feel free to give your stupid lectures somewhere else , don't be hypocritical !

You accuse me of lacking objectivity while you've No objectivity yourself.

I'm NOT forcing my opinions on others, I'm just supporting all the opinions which you're suppressing. Cowmadness (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

The Zionist then ID's himself as M Nov: That was me, sorry. I'm not trying to be objective in your talk page, I'm saying that when editing or discussing edits of articles, it is good to be objective. As for me suppressing, and you supporting all opinions, well, insults aside, wikipedia isn't the place for political discourse, or, at least, don't partake in it in the actual articles, and when you edit an article and apply your own POV you are forcing your opinions upon others.--M Nov ~ Look upon my work ye mighty, and despair (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Just for your ignorance to realize, (NO Offence Meant of Course)

I don't edit articles according to my views, I only express them where appropriate for example in discussion pages.

Discussion Pages are there so people can discuss different/opposing View Points, If that angers you then it's your own problem.

Did you catch me editing some article where I did enforce my views, NO you didn't (Talk Pages Don't Count)

Oh you don't want to be objective ? so what's the point listening to you anyways..

Go Shoot the Breeze buddy !

Regards Cowmadness (talk) 19:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Matt Zane Pose.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Matt Zane Pose.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)