User talk:Coyote-37

Tongue-in-cheek
Thanks for putting your money where my mouth was by writing a stub Tongue-in-cheek article. I had planned to do a definition article, but I just hadn't gotten around to it. Your write-up is a great start for an encyclopedia entry, so I don't think we need to move it to Wiktionary. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:57, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
 * No problemo. It's 'he' by the way!

RE: 194.80.21.10
In fact 194.80.21.10 (and also 194.80.20.10) are my own school's IP addresses. You mentioned that you suspect the vandalism is only by a small group of kids - I doubt it. I have seen it taking place and know that it is the source of much vandalism from many different students. Secondly you mentioned a complete ban on the IP address. In case you didn't know, if an IP address is blocked, any user (signed in or not) cannot edit Wikipedia. So, if 194.80.21.10 is blocked, I wouldn't be able to edit at school, and any other legit users wouldn't either, whether they had an account or not. Thanks, Fir  e  Fo  x  17:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and wasn't aware that an IP ban blocks registered user accounts from that address, so thanks for clearing that up. It seems we'll just have to lump it then! Coyote-37 10:02, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Whoa, teenager's encyclopedia
Hehe, those are hard words. I have not seen many teenager content yet. Maybe because I don't come here so often. I saw you are also a fan of Asimov's works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davichito (talk • contribs) 18:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to William Wallace, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 18:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * thanks, I'll remember that. I only dip in and out of Wiki editing (as you can see from above, I've become pretty disillisioned with it), but I want to follow the accepted conventions when I do edit, so I'll bare that in mind Coyote-37 (talk)

Proposed deletion of Target: 2006


The article Target: 2006 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable story arc, mostly in-universe plot summary, and the "sources" are pure OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reyk YO!  07:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)