User talk:Cozyretirement

Welcome!
Hello, Cozyretirement, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Self Directed IRA With Checkbook Control Through A Business Trust, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NawlinWiki (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Self Directed IRA With Checkbook Control Through A Business Trust


A tag has been placed on Self Directed IRA With Checkbook Control Through A Business Trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Business Entity Options For A Self Directed IRA for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Business Entity Options For A Self Directed IRA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Business Entity Options For A Self Directed IRA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

about articles
Your article appears to be primarily WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH, perhaps based on your existing knowledge as an expert/professional in the field. The sources you used are either wikipedia itself (not a reliable source for its own articles), or WP:PRIMARY sources (the government publications). All analysis and evaluation of laws/primary documents must be done by WP:RELIABLESOURCES that are WP:SECONDARY. The absence of such sources also raises issues of possible WP:NOTABILITY

IRAs and self directed IRAs are notable, many books and articles writen about them. Where are the bloomberg (etc) articles about "business entity options for SIRAs"? If there are such articles, then we could potentially have an article as well, but ours would have to be based primarily on what those reliable articles themselves said, not whatever research you yourself have done (even if correct)

Finally, the style of your article is not encyclopedic. Its more like an essay or howto. While those may be appropriate (and valuable) on the net as a whole, they are not what an encyclopedia is looking for. See WP:NOTGUIDE

Let me know if you have further questions. You may reply here. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your insights. I will be addressing these shortly through edits on the article. Would you recommend that I remove the links to other Wikipedia articles if they are not considered reliable? Cozyretirement


 * As a general rule, wikipedia cannot be used a source for itself. However Help:Link from one article to another where someone can learn more about a topic is very valuable. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)