User talk:CozzaG

December 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drake equation. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''You're making your first edits, which are questionable for a long-standing article. Seek editor feedback and consensus for the change first on the talk page.'' Zefr (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Thanks for the message but please, help me to understand better.
 * I made the same changes on the Italian page of the Drake Equation and they were published without problems, also because the text I add is based on scientific articles that I added in the references.
 * Basically what I need to do is translate what I have already published on the same page into Italian.
 * Do you have any idea how I can do it?
 * Or, you could better highlight what is disruptive in my speech, so that I can change it.
 * Thank you CozzaG (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The present article is concise, accurate and well-sourced. There is little need to change something that is solid, long-standing encyclopedic content unlikely to be reinterpreted in any constructive way.
 * Your edit rambles and reads like a sophomore thought experiment for course credits. It is WP:OR. Your sources are 50-60 years old (one is from 2022), and added nothing new of significance by my reading. Your edit also violates WP:MOS, so spend time understanding style rules before further editing. The talk page allows anyone to begin a discussion allowing experienced editors to consider and debate the proposed changes. The disruption is both making large changes without talk page consensus, WP:CON, and reverting my revert of your edit without doing as you were asked - propose changes first on the talk page.
 * I don't read the Italian Wikipedia nor do I speak Italian, so I am unable to help you. Zefr (talk) 23:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)