User talk:Cpacsys

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

User name.
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Cpacsys", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you.
 * CPACsys would seem to be a general account for people at CPAC. accounts should be used by a single individual, not by a position or multiple people.Naraht (talk) 16:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Central Philippine Adventist College


The article Central Philippine Adventist College has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I did a Google search of this college and did not find many third-party references. And those that did found were only trivial."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.. Catfurball (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)