User talk:Cpcpnewell

Speedy deletion of Anthony Macauley Associates
A tag has been placed on Anthony Macauley Associates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 21:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Finngall   talk  19:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Some useful links:
 * The guideline on companies
 * The guideline on reliable sources
 * Just because one company has an article on Wikipedia does not automatically mean a similar company ought to
 * --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Given that on the talk page you refer to "our" company, perhaps a perusal of the guidelines on conflict of interest is in order as well. -- Finngall   talk  21:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

The Anthony Macauley article
Hi. The above article has been deleted for the third time, in each case for the same reason - it doesn't assert why the company is notable. Essentially, why is this company important? What makes it more important than the thousands of other generic firms in the world?

A credible assertion of notability is generally sufficient toa void speedy deletion of the page. To make sure the article survives in the long term however, it is also going to need references from reliable independent sources to back up the notability claim.

I notice you went to the trouble of adding an infobox and wikilinks, so to avoid you having to repeat this in a future version of the article, I've saved the deleted text at User:Cpcpnewell/Anthony Macauley. If you want to recreate the article with details (and references) explaining why it is notable, you can do so at that subpage and when its ready simply cut and paste it into the mainspace.

Let me know if the above seems unclear or if I can help in any way. Euryalus (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "GX Salaries"
A page you created, GX Salaries, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GX Programmes


The article GX Programmes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * software with no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GX Financials


The article GX Financials has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * software with no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)