User talk:Cpellis17/sandbox

Peer Review
- sources seem reliable - possibly try to make the style of writing easier to read - some term's could be explained or could link to the wiki page for that term (e.g.neural degeneration) - otherwise looks good

-Peer Review #2-

You have quality sources and the information you have written so far seems relevant. Everything is written well. The only suggestion is to consider linking some complicated terms throughout the current article that the previous author did not. Overall it is a very good draft.

Maggie Crutchfield — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgcrutch (talk • contribs) 22:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)