User talk:Craaaaazy1

Speedy deletion of Wwe finishing moves
A tag has been placed on Wwe finishing moves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – LATICS   talk  21:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

March 2010
The recent edit you made to the page Walking has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 11:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wiltshire, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wiltshire was changed by Craaaaazy1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970561 on 2011-10-03T14:16:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wiltshire, you may be blocked from editing. Old Moonraker (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wiltshire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=453702937 here]. Vrenator (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kwsn  (Ni!)  14:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)