User talk:CrabsPlankqon

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Religion in the United Kingdom, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 15:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Brazil. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 15:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ferdinand Marcos, you may be blocked from editing.   Snowycats (talk) 04:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 10:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from 2022 Philippine presidential election. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Philippine Senate election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Showiecz (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Philippine Senate election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Showiecz (talk) 03:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Oqwert (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Masagana 99, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Asian Americans. Oqwert (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 37.160.160.89 (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)