User talk:Crack Cocaine Aficionado

Nomination of Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RA 0808 talkcontribs 23:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You are blocked for direct violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by creating an article that was clearly intended as a coatrack to attack Trump, and for re-creating after being directly warned, abusing Wikipedia as a soapbox for your personal opinions. Your chosen title pretty much sums up the aim of the article. The subject might warrant an article, but you aren't the person to create it.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You tyranically abused your power by deceitfully misrepresenting the outcome of the discussion with your blatant falsehood "the result was speedy delete" which you and I both know not to be true, even though you have hidden the evidence. You very well know that no one had voted except you, myself, and the person who nominated the article for deletion in the first place and therefore your characterization of the discussion was woefully false. Therefore, my re-creation of the article was demanded by policy, since you illicitly closed the article prior to anyone else even voting on it. Tell me, how is it that Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories and Barack the Magical Negro and all sorts of racist, far-right Conservative, White Nationalist, neo-Nazi trash is "notable", but there is nothing notable about death threats against the current president by the butler and historian and right-hand man of the Republican nominee, when they have prompted federal investigation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crack Cocaine Aficionado (talk • contribs) 00:41, 18 May 2016

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Max Semenik (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)