User talk:Cracker989

YE YE

The article Phil Ward has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Phil Ward, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ry Jones 16:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The Chlown
A tag has been placed on The Chlown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:The Chlown. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jay &dagger;  Litman  16:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Korean Demilitarized Zone
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Jay &dagger;  Litman  15:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

removing speedy deletion tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Jay &dagger;  Litman  16:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Personal attacks
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent personal attacks will not be tolerated. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jay &dagger;  Litman  16:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Free Speech
I now feel as if my free speech rights have been violated. Nothing I have said was threatening or offensive in any way, and yet they have been deleted. If this is the way that Wikipedia operates then a sudden dropoff in use and users will follow.
 * You've never said anything offensive about another editor? You user talk page history clearly indicates otherwise. Name-calling is a violation of wikipedia's policy on civility and is considered a personal attack. Jay  &dagger;  Litman  16:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Did it cause stress or conflict?
 * I suspect you live in the United States, so I invite you to read the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution. If you still don't understand why your rights to free speech have not been violated I can explain it to you further (hint... this is a privately operated website not owned by the U.S. Government).--Isotope23 17:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow way too much time on your hands man..try masturbating.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Indent.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Indent.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Deli nk 15:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Deli nk 15:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. - Alison ☺ 15:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Virginia Tech
Please don't insert this kind of unsubstantiated slanderous rumour. This is an extremely serious accusation and should not be made lightly. Pascal.Tesson 15:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

nigga i got sources

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by Shirahadasha. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. 48 hour block for inserting slander into the encyclopedia after prior warnings. See WP:BLP. --Shirahadasha 15:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chensiyuan 00:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BHH-81000-5-web.jpg
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: copyright vio of http://www.dallaslibrary.org/highland.htm --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposed: Southside Dallas → List of neighborhoods in Dallas, Texas
It has been proposed to merge the content of Southside Dallas into List of neighborhoods in Dallas, Texas. Since you have previously edited one of these articles, I thought you might be interested. You're welcome to participate in the discussion if you like. --B. Wolterding 12:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Southside Dallas
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Southside Dallas, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. B. Wolterding (talk) 18:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)