User talk:Craig.cantin

Green Bloggers
Hi there. I've added the "prod" template to the article Green Bloggers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Green Bloggers. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  19:13, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Green-bloggers-masthead.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Green-bloggers-masthead.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  19:13, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Link on Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
Hi there, I noticed you put a link on the Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand article. Links need to be relevant (which it is), but also to add something to the article. The site you gave only has info from FrogBlog. So, nothing new has come from it. If you still want to add the link, use the talk page first. --Midnighttonight 03:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Green Bloggers
Hello there Craig, just wanted to say that although I pointed out the "vanity" in the article, I didn't mean that this should lead to its deletion - as you can see, i voted to keep the article. The AfD procedure is standard when a prod template is removed without discussion, and the prod template can be removed legitimately if the article is improved along the lines of the complaint. The process of AfD, in cases like this, is just to make sure that those articles from which the template is removed belong here. It seems the consensus, fortunately, will be to keep the article. So don't worry! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Con Dem Talk 04:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD Progressive Bloggers
You have edited the article Progressive Bloggers. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the wp:afd process. You may contribute to this discussion by commenting here. Thank you.Edivorce 23:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:GeorginaWilcock2344x2832.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:GeorginaWilcock2344x2832.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Green Bloggers
I have nominated Green Bloggers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Green Bloggers&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:GeorginaWilcock2344x2832.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GeorginaWilcock2344x2832.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 20:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Elizabeth May, Leader of the Green Party of Canada.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth May, Leader of the Green Party of Canada.jpg, which you've attributed to https://www.flickr.com/photos/greenpartyofcanada/10039226273/in/set-72157636087736854. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 18:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)