User talk:CraigBrown

Hi. I notice you have replaced the content at Daily Record with your own version, which is excessively flattering in tone and style to the Record. The removal of information regarding Section 28 is particularly uncalled for and could be construed as whitewashing. I have looked at the version that was there before, and agree that it is excessively harsh, but it provides a better basis for improvement than a hagiography. I have reverted back to the old version, whilst deleting one particular paragraph that should not have been there. Your edit did provide a bunch of new information which should be helpful when we flesh this out. You may wish to review our policies about neutrality, verifiability, and also have a look at our house style guide. Thanks, Morwen - Talk 11:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * in addition, the prose contained phrases like "In July 2000 the multi-million plan to re-house our Scottish titles was complete." with patently inappropriate use of "our" to refer to the Paper. Can I assume you are an employee or agent of the Record?  Morwen - Talk 11:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * excellent. Might I suggest when you have revisions you wish to make again, you put them on the talk page (or to me)?  Generally I find making small revisions in easily digestible chunks the way to go. Morwen - Talk 14:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)