User talk:CraigVHenry

Welcome!
Hello, CraigVHenry, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Immortality — The Real Secret
Hello, CraigVHenry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Immortality — The Real Secret, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Immortality — The Real Secret


The page Draft:Immortality — The Real Secret has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/shepherd-lightfoot.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Maybe use Wikisource?
Hi! I came here from the help desk. I have no idea of the specifics, but you may want to put those PD translations of early Christian material on Wikisource. Try to find material that is clearly in the public domain (i.e., translations made prior to 1928), and clearly document where they came from. They unquestionably belong at Wikisource. Wikisource is ideal for this because it has all the technical capabilities to track the wikisource text back to the scanned pages. This completely decouples the copyright issues from any issues of suitability of your quotations here in Wikipedia. The extent of those quotations is then a matter of editorial judgement and can be discussed on the article talk pages to reach consensus, without the distraction of the copyright (non)issue. -Arch dude (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)