User talk:Craigboy/Archive 1

oops
my keyboard pressed return by itself b4 the end of the summary, but i can add something to the talkpage if you want me to. Penyulap  ☏  15:56, 20 Jun 2012 (UTC)

-(o)-(o)- I'm glaring at you
which is like, all I'd want to do really, but seriously, this can't go on forever, you've got to ask for a bit of help or something, consensus is clear, and although I am in the right, I'm not going to be an asshole and take you to ANI, because you are one of the most brilliant editors on the ISS talkpage for discussing things. Just because those two what does reg foreman say all the time ? just because they don't know what consensus is, doesn't mean you can't count. They set such a bad example that it confuses everyone. I should do something about that sooner rather than later. Penyulap  ☏  13:17, 21 Jun 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox cargo spacecraft
Discussion moved to Template_talk:Infobox_cargo_spacecraft

Hi Craigboy, would you like to help Jssteil‎ ?
I've been working to help Jssteil‎, a newbie who is also a NASA employee (What? Penyulap helping NASA?? Is it the end of the world already) he's been working away in the space medicine department, if you recall there was another editor who came to the wikiproject a few months back I think, wanting to clean up the space medicine articles that we had, I tried contacting him and someone else to no avail. The only thing needed here is someone who would like to give a bit of guidance on what they want in the way of space medicine on wikipedia. People are looking at it as COI and so on, and they have a fair point, there is nothing actually wrong with what is being added per se, it's just boring and needs a bit of interest added to it, chuck the boring stuff, compress the interesting points. Everything we have on spaceflight touches on medicine, but nobody cares to fill in the blanks, same as the science on the space stations, it's a boring sort of subject.

If you'd like to point out what kind of medicinal :) coverage you'd like to see added and support or review it, that would be one easy task as Jssteil‎ has been given the job of helping improve wikipedia in that area. It's a bit like Ralf Vandebergh someone just needs to look at what is on offer properly, rather than automatically discarding everything, and then we would have an addition. I just thought to mention it, as I consider your ability to work with other editors brilliant and yeah, your into spacey stuff too :) Plus, it's a bit ironic that Penyulap seems to be the only one trying to help NASA, don't you think ? Penyulap  ☏  04:18, 15 Jul 2012 (UTC)

Falcon 9
While the Falcon 9 article could go any of several ways (a high-level model class article, on all F9 vehicles, or an article on the F9 in general PLUS the specific F9 v1.0 model, etc.), some edits got made today that are presuming a particular outcome. Therefore, to get the issue quickly resolved, I proposed a move on the Talk page. I don't really care which way it goes, but do hope you and other editors will weigh in. N2e (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Falcon rocket family diagram
Hey Craigboy, there is some new and updated discussion on the Wikimedia page for that family drawing you made.

Here's the link: Cheers. N2e (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

chemistry
Craigboy, on 22nd of April 2013 you did this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dragon_%28spacecraft%29&action=historysubmit&diff=551580857&oldid=550311711

You copy-pasted the text "NTO/MMH" from an FAA pdf and wikified it as "\[\[Monomethylhydrazine|NTO]]/\[\[Methylacetylene|MMH]]". You do not need even high school chemistry to know that's wrong. Just clicking is enough. I don't know why this mistake survived for 11 months. Please read John D. Clark's "Ingition!" before editing propellant related stuff. Zeev.tarantov (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Be courteous. Mistakes happen, it looks like it was a copy error.--Craigboy (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

RE: Documentary
It is not defamation if it is true. The DOB (8/6/1967) is available in the California Birth Registry and court references are all correct, as well as the referenced documentary Trans/Formed (2007).

In February 2007, a Los Angeles judge ruled "Eve" could legally chaged her name from William Ervin Pilger to Erika Elizabeth Ervin. At that time, a new birth certificate was issued. The decision came after "Eve" applied and published a notice regarding the change in her gender and identity in Los Angeles's Metropolitan News-Enterprise newspaper. In court documents "Eve's" doctor, Emanuel R. Lim, gave a declaration to the court that: 'Miss Ervin has undergone irreversible surgery that changed sex characteristics as a part of her transition from male to female. On October 6, 2006 Eve [Erika Ervin] was examined and diagnosed with gender identity disorder and underwent reassignment surgery at Piyavate Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KCRos (talk • contribs) 22:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Have you seen Trans/Formed? I'm having trouble finding sources for some of those statements, can you either link or explicitly state where each is from?--Craigboy (talk) 23:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

I have seen it. In it, there are black and white photos, from a head shot of Bill Pilger. In it, Erika Ervin says that her name had been 'Bill Pilger,' she laughs and acts somewhat embarrassed and states that she graduated from Skyline High School in 1985. Her hair is straight and about shoulder length in the film. The Skyline High School (Oakland, CA) yearbook from 1985 shows a photo of BP in a senior photo, other photos are of Bill/William Pilger on the basketball team, although I think they may have been from junior year. If you want to double check it is available at Ancestry.com. The birth certificate issued to William Pilger (DOB 8/6/1967) has the parent names listed as Patricia and William. The documentary itself has completely disappeared from the net, along with its trailer. The court case documents are available thru the Los Angeles Superior Court and also can be viewed in an article in the Irish Daily News from January 29, 2011 called 'Secret of the 'World's Tallest Model'... She Used to Be a 7ft Man ; As She Prepares to Visit Ireland, We Reveal the Extraordinary Past of Towering Beauty Amazon Eve [Eire Region]' — Preceding unsigned comment added by KCRos (talk • contribs) 23:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you obtain a copy of the documentary?--Craigboy (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

If you would like more information on the film, please contact Cleo Valente, Executive Producer/Director or Tom Bibiyan Co-Executive Producer by email at avantiproductions@gmail.com KCRos (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I emailed them but haven't gotten a response.--Craigboy (talk) 10:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

RE: AE/EE KCRos I am related to this individual. The reason there is no supporting documentation is that AE/EE has threatened legal action against everyone from family members to websites in Ireland to the US, blogs, Youtube, documentary, etc. In regard to your research, the answers are all true, but proving them in this forum might not be the best course of action. Plenty of people in show business lie/distort facts about their age and history. Wether or not it is any of our business, is probably not up for public discussion. If AE/EE wants to present a public profile that reflects many facts that are untrue, in the end do we really give a SH!T? Her life, notoriety is pretty meaningless in the grand scheme of things. On a personal note, if ever in your private life you are forced to deal with this individual, again, please know that it is not slander nor defamation if it is true. All of the statements and leads that you have looked into are factual. Hopefully, knowing that is enough. Roddylaves (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

MCT launch vehicle
Hi Craigboy. You added that the MCT launch vehicle would "consist of one or three cores" over in the new section of the MCT article on the launch vehicle.

My question is could you point us to a source for the multiple cores? I know a LOT of folks are speculating on a three core, like the Falcon Heavy, and can point to old (and very preliminary, and later walked back) charts showing a three-core X and XX rockets on a powerpoint slide in 2010). But I've not seen a source where SpaceX has said any more than the LV for the MCT would use Raptor, would use 9 of them, and would be 10 metres in diameter.

Thanks. N2e (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * "nine of these immensely powerful engines – on one or three cores – will be utilized to send SpaceX’s Super Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle (SHLV) uphill on missions to Mars"--Craigboy (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1 WTC rendering.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:1 WTC rendering.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:ISROorbitalvehicle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ISROorbitalvehicle.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geogene (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * It is not replaceable with a free equivalent. Please do not delete fair-use images that you have not found a free equivalent for. I do not check my wikipedia account daily.--Craigboy (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The trouble is that a free equivalent could be made. In order to use a copyrighted image under the fair use rules, the image has to be one that can not be replaced by a free version, even in theory. There are very few images like that, usually ones that have important historical significance. Geogene (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons
Since this looks like this is your home wiki, just giving you an 'additional' ping about the talk page message I left you at Commons regarding File:NASA_spacecrafts.jpg. Revent talk 19:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
N2e (talk) 03:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 W.  D.   Graham  08:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Gamergate notification
Woodroar (talk) 01:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight: Retirement of project member WD Graham
You are invited to join the discussion at WikiProject Spaceflight. WD Graham, formerly operating under the editor name of GW Simulations, has retired from Wikipedia. Please pop on over to offer a remembrance, or thanks, or ... (...maybe talk him in to giving it another go.) Thanks. N2e (talk) 06:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Pressurized Mating Adapters
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pressurized Mating Adapters, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/Pressurized_Mating_Adapter.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Whoops, looks like we had conflicting ideas! Let's discuss which title is better...Altamel (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * We can do it here. Pressurized Mating Adapter (PMA) is following the same capitalization structure of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).--Craigboy (talk) 03:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm, but the issue is whether Pressurized Mating Adapter is a proper noun...WP:NCCAPS says the title should only be capitalized when it is a proper noun. I'm inclined to agree that PMA is a proper noun, but there is another, more serious issue: you should not copy and paste text from one article to the other to rename a title. That fragments the page history and violates the author attribution required for the CC-BY-SA license. Altamel (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I apologize. It's been several years since I'm moved a page, I forgot the proper procedure.--Craigboy (talk) 04:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Since we can't just move Pressurized mating adapter to Pressurized Mating Adapter now (too many edits in the way), I'll list the situation at Requested_moves/Technical_requests. Please weigh in&mdash;it will help establish a consensus for renaming. Altamel (talk) 04:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Mercury-Atlas 7 insignia is wrong
On the Aurora 7 talk page, wrote in April 2009 that the image was wrong, in that the 7 is supposed to be blue, not red. Someone soon responded by changing it to which confirms the 7 was indeed blue. You reverted this in December 2011, after you cleaned up the original image. Can you please fix that image by changing the color of the 7? (Alternatively, we probably should go back to the photo.) Thanks.

This issue is complicated by the fact that the sources of these images aren't well documented (SpaceHistory101 thinks "Ed Buckbee", apparently an MSFC public affairs person, created them as souvenir patches), and also by the fact that NASA apparently had mission patches (Gemini- and Apollo-style) done after the fact. Where do you think would be the best place to discuss this bigger issue? JustinTime55 (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Modern Rome image
You are at 3RR. I strongly suggest you use the talk page and don't revert again. – SchroCat (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You're at 4.--Craigboy (talk) 11:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Nope: count again. - SchroCat (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I can link the page history if you want.--Craigboy (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. I've made 3 reverts, not 4, so I'm at 3RR, not 4. – SchroCat (talk) 12:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You're forgetting the initial one. But this is a meaningless argument, so can we please just discuses the different versions of the paintings?--Craigboy (talk) 12:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've forgotten nothing: that's not a revert. – SchroCat (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Can we please focus on the different versions of the paintings?--Craigboy (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Contact Request
Hi, popular YouTuber SmarterEveryDay wants to talk to you. The best way seems to be through his Twitter. 95.44.57.106 (talk) 01:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't really do twiiter. Can you tell him to make a wiki account and talk with me here?--Craigboy (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Apollo 11 first step.jpg
Hello. Thanks for your good work upgrading this image from NASA's partially restored TV footage. There's only one small problem: as caught on the Apollo 11 talk page, this is actually Aldrin, not Armstrong, descending the ladder. The telltale sign is the white area to the left of the thigh, which doesn't match the lunar horizon. This is sunlight reflecting off of Armstrong's visor, as he was hidden behind the landing gear as Aldrin was descending. If you watch the video carefully, you see that Armstrong's descent doesn't match this picture, while Aldrin's does. And after he makes it to the surface, Armstrong comes around from behind the leg, into the camera view.

I temporarily fixed this by changing the caption to correctly identify Aldrin (and also made a clumsy note on the Commons page, based on the assumption NASA made the mistake), before I saw that the original photo with the ugly horizontal bar correctly showed Armstrong, and you had made the change. Since this photo is used in several articles, with captions saying it's Armstrong, I think a better fix would be for you to go back to the restored video and pick a proper frame of Armstrong. Can you please do this? Thanks. After you do, I'll revert my changes. JustinTime55 (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I've gone back and looked at the restored footage to see if I could find a good screen capture of Armstrong descending the ladder. But the footage seems significantly less sharp then Jatkins' upload (at least of Armstrong), so we may just want to permanently revert back to his/her image.--Craigboy (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragon landing on Mars.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dragon landing on Mars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Grants:IEG/Wikipedia likes Galactic Exploration for Posterity 2015
Dear Fellow Wikipedians,

I JethroBT (WMF) suggested that I consult with fellow Wikipedians to get feedback and help to improve my idea about "As an unparalleled way to raise awareness of the Wikimedia projects, I propose to create a tremendous media opportunity presented by launching Wikipedia via space travel."

Please see the idea at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Wikipedia_likes_Galactic_Exploration_for_Posterity_2015. Please post your suggestions on the talk page and please feel free to edit the idea and join the project.

Thank you for your time and attention in this matter. I appreciate it.

My best regards, Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Androgynous Peripheral Attach System page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=688286257 your edit] caused a coauthors without author error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F688286257%7CAndrogynous Peripheral Attach System%5D%5D Ask for help])

Neutral buoyancy pool
Thanks! Awesome article; nice work! I'm a little concerned about the duplication of information in Neutral buoyancy simulation as a training aid; could you take a look at both articles and try to make sure the subjects are clearly delineated? —Swpbtalk 13:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have, Neutral buoyancy simulation as a training aid is in very unusual format for a wiki article and only mentions Gemini to Skylab. The pages could eventually be merged. Our maybe we could rename "neutral buoyancy pools" to "list of neutral buoyancy pools". Although at this point I'm unsure.--Craigboy (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Renaming to "List of..." could work; so could a merge. I'll give it some thought as well. —Swpbtalk 21:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Chinese Docking Mechanism.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chinese Docking Mechanism.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:SpaceX CRS-3.png
Thank you for uploading File:SpaceX CRS-3.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ras67 (talk) 23:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:SpaceX CRS-2.png
Thank you for uploading File:SpaceX CRS-2.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ras67 (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:CRS SpX-1 emblem.png
Thank you for uploading File:CRS SpX-1 emblem.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the di-fails NFCC tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ras67 (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CRS SpX-1 emblem.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CRS SpX-1 emblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SpaceX CRS-2.png
 Thanks for uploading File:SpaceX CRS-2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SpaceX CRS-3.png
 Thanks for uploading File:SpaceX CRS-3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Voskhod 2 EVA.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Voskhod 2 EVA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Origin orbital spacecraft.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blue Origin orbital spacecraft.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Voskhod 2 EVA.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Voskhod 2 EVA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Left a Message at Talk:Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport
Hi Craigboy! I left a message on Talk:Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport regarding a clarification tag you put in April of 2013 (edit summary April 2013), please let me know what you think (if you have the time to do so). I know it was 5 years ago though. Thanks!173.52.238.41 (talk) 02:05, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:China&#39;s first spacewalk.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:China&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

NASA nominated for good article reassessment
NASA, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

I am notifying you, because you seem to be a major contributor to that article. Feel free to delete this notice. ― Hebsen (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

John Cornyn article
Hello, Craigboy. Please stop adding “instigated by Donald Trump” to the John Cornyn article, in relation to his vote opposing a Jan. 6 commission. That is not supported by the reference, and in any case it is not relevant to the report of how Cornyn voted. Thank you.-- MelanieN (talk) 19:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Voskhod 2 EVA.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Voskhod 2 EVA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Commercial Resupply Services missions
Template:Commercial Resupply Services missions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)