User talk:Crairdin

Please read the guidelines on conflict of interest editing carefully
Hello, Crairdin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Biblical software, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 06:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Response
You can delete or block me if you feel I'm posting material that is biased in some way. I'm only trying to correct blatant errors of fact. You'll note that I have not created articles about my company or its products, even though my competitors have created blatantly commercial articles about their companies and products.

I don't have time to figure out this dated and obscure wiki thing. If I'm making it worse by making corrections to assertions of fact by referring to knowledge that I uniquely possess, then cite those specific incidents and suggest corrections instead of "welcoming" me by posting vague threats.Craig (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)