User talk:Cran32/Archive 1

March 2017
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yes California have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your edit caused significant damage to the article. It may be inadvertent due to a plug-in in your browser; if that's the case, make sure to turn the plug-in off, especially while editing any articles related to the current President of the United States.'' —C.Fred (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles E. Brown Middle School (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles E. Brown Middle School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  18:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This will never be an article. I'm going to request that you authorize deletion of it by pasting  at the top of the draft page. Without exceptional circumstances, middle and elementary schools do not have articles.  I see nothing to indicate this should be an exception. John from Idegon (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

International relations
Why are you adding a section called "international relations" to many city articles? It isn't a heading outlined in WP:USCITIES. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * My apology, it was only added to Burbank. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * And now you have added it to Newton, Massachusetts. Why are you adding this?  Magnolia677 (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

I just realized that the guidlines for editing US cities to which I was adhereing are located at Wikiproject International Relations and are only editing suggestions, not actual guidlines. I deeply apologize for any harm I may have caused, and will go back and change the articles I have altered as outlined in WP: USCITIES. Sorry again, Cran32 (talk) 19:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Questions Regarding Early Presidential Primaries (1940 and Back)

 * I've been working collecting data on the results for the Democratic Presidential caucuses or state conventions that were held in earlier years, 1940 being the starting point given I was interested at the time in the Anti-Third Term movement that had sprung up then, and while I can't access all the data in question anyway (I'm using the New York Times as a source, but I'm not a subscriber and so can't look at the articles in detail), I've provided them in the talk pages. Having gotten down to 1928 now, however, I'm not certain how best to display the information given, and I'm not sure if there really is a precedent(s) for it given the operational differences between the Modern Primary and the more Archaic Primary of yesteryear. For example;


 * 1) In 1928 Al Smith clearly won the Democratic Presidential Preference Primary in Ohio over Senator Atlee Pomerene, but the latter was awarded the entirety of the delegation. The situation in question is in an article I provided on the talk page for the '28 Democratic Primaries, but when you have delegates not being bound or awarded based on the results of a Primary, should that be counted as a separate contest? How should we display that on a map? Should one be given preference?
 * 2) Depending on the year in question you either end up with a handful, none, or a whole slew of favorite-son candidates ready to represent State delegations, and these candidates technically have "won" delegates. However in some cases, like those I identified for the 1968 Republican nomination race, are far more than the infobox could possibly handle when combined with the actual candidates (even if we are just talking about candidates and favorite sons that won delegates, that would make 17). Should we give preference based on delegates won? On actual candidates vs. Favorite Sons? What about if they've withdrawn and endorsed a candidate? Should Favorite Sons be combined somehow (for map and infobox purposes) and explained separately in another section?
 * 3) In a number of the Presidential Primaries and even Caucuses I have encountered language that the delegates in question are officially unpledged or uninstructed, but have a strong preference or are generally understood for being for a certain candidate. Under those conditions, should those delegations be considered Unpledged, or should they be considered as being for the candidate? Should the votes of those delegations be included in a candidate's vote total?
 * These are the major questions at the moment. I'll also be asking a few others Presidential Elections Wikiproject as well to chime in, so if you have any ideas on how best I should proceed, I'd ask that the responses be put into Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1932. Thanks ahead of time. --Ariostos (talk) 03:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Deletion discussion about The Shops at Putterham
Hello, Cran32,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Shops at Putterham should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/The Shops at Putterham.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sierra Trading Post, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ocean Township, New Jersey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sierra_Trading_Post check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sierra_Trading_Post?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of World Citizens Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Citizens Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/World Citizens Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 01:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Latino-Vote Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latino-Vote Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Latino-Vote Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 01:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Chestnut Hill Square for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chestnut Hill Square is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chestnut Hill Square until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 02:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)