User talk:Crancidmccheese

Welcome!
Hello, Crancidmccheese, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Cotton ceiling does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Crancidmccheese! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:36, Thursday, August 31, 2023 (UTC)

Your WP:UAA reports
From the UAA Header: please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks. All three of your reports have been stale accounts that have never edited since account creation with the "newest" creation still being 7 years ago!!!! Do not report accounts with no edits that were created years ago. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I came here to say pretty much the same thing. Please do not file reports at WP:UAA about accounts that have not edited recently. Administrators need to focus on active ongoing disruption. Accounts that have never edited or last edited many years ago are not disruptive, and do not deserve even a minute or two of scrutiny by an administrator. Please limit yourself accordingly. Cullen328 (talk) 06:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Trans woman, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Crancidmccheese. I just want to make sure that you understand that you got off very lightly to receive the warning above. Your obviously intentionally disruptive edits to Trans woman would have earned you a rather stronger warning for vandalism if I had noticed them first. Please repay Sideswipe9th's kindness by not making any further attempts at vandalism. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have not done any vandalism, though, so I’m confused by the warning. Is transgenderism not autogynephilia? Crancidmccheese (talk) 13:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You tried to redirect the entire article Trans woman to Blanchard's typology which is a fringe theory about trans people. That's very obviously vandalism with the plain intent to damage Wikipedia and to cause offence. "Is transgenderism not autogynephilia?". No. For so many reasons, no. There is no such thing as "transgenderism". There are only trans people. People are not an "ism". "autogynephilia" is a fringe theory/hypothesis/conjecture that is almost universally rejected by the medical community. It almost certainly does not exist and, if it does, it is almost certainly not specific to trans women. You know this because you clearly looked at the article in order to find the "correct" part of it to redirect to. Please don't play dumb. Please do not do any further vandalism or you may be blocked from editing. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Anyway, instead of arguing with me here, you should probably take a look at the Administrators' noticeboard thread linked below. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * In any event, I don’t think Sideswipe9th as a transgender thought my edits were worthy of a block. Maybe ask him what his thoughts are? Crancidmccheese (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.37.47.160.130 (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)