User talk:CrapNougat

Now working towards a standard offer. Hopeful for a username reset in 6 months. May pursue edit suggestions if administrators decide that the chosen time is unacceptable. CrapNougat (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane and suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  21:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

You’ll need to address your use of multiple accounts as well. only (talk) 00:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

CuriousMastodon is because we use the same router so the IP is the same, Flibblebops was because at first I wasn't sure why I was blocked and didn't think it was fair or bad or something, so I saw a page I thought needed editing and was blocked so I thought it would be good to make another account. I should've thought that through a bit more, honestly. Can I copyedit for a while or something so you can see I want to help? I don't want to affect the other people on my IP either CrapNougat (talk) 00:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Please review my block. I have seen a few pages that need extremely minor copyediting and it's quite unsatisfying not being able to fix them CrapNougat (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, the edit with Flibblebops overstepped what I should've done, I was trying to reduce bias already present in the article and I overdid it, clearly. I intend to copyedit in the future. The reasoning behind that edit was flawed. From now on all I intend to do is copyedit. CrapNougat (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Can I instead have an expiration date set for the block? Perhaps I could work it out that way. CrapNougat (talk) 20:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Standard offer/ban review
After being inactive on Wikipedia for over 6 months, I would like to request a ban review and username change .CrapNougat (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please file a new unblock request. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  15:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll do it correctly now CrapNougat (talk) 22:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

How can I get unblocked? I honestly made some mistakes and did things I should not have done, but now I've agreed that I won't continue the activity. Can I please talk through this with someone?. CrapNougat (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Your best chance is WP:SO. Six months with zero editing. At that point, you'll need to explain why you went out of your way to mislead us here. This will count substantially against you; if we cannot trust an editor's word, it's very hard to believe any assurances they give us, and you worked hard to demonstrate we cannot trust your word. --Yamla (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

I have completed WP:SO as requested, and would like to request an unblock review. I will avoid all of the behavior that I engaged in back in 2020, and I will move forward to improve Wikipedia in an unbiased way. What happened then was that I saw a page I thought was biased and wanted to correct it, however, I had a ban on this account because of the username (at the time of account creation I chose the name as a joke but had not read the rules for usernames). I thought I could still make the edits, so I made a new account, and did so. Unfortunately, because of the block on this account, I felt angered towards Wikipedia and overdid my editing, which put bias into the article. Additionally, I had participated in sockpuppetry by making that second account. I now understand that the edits I made were completely uncalled for, politically charged, and done in a way that was directly against the guidelines. In the future I do not want to do anything of the sort and instead plan to restrict myself to only fixing mistakes like missed capitalization or punctuation for a time until I have worked out the discomfort of being blocked for an extended period of time. I did deserve the punishment and I now want to move forward in a way that benefits Wikipedia. CrapNougat (talk) 01:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)


 * , besides the technical data, User talk:LostBestShowEvah also shows a behavioral thing that you may recognize as well. Drmies (talk) 01:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * CrapNougat, you have not completed the standard offer. I also share Drmies's concern. I believe not only are you attempting to mislead us about completing WP:SO, you are also a returning WP:LTA. Given these concerns, there's essentially no path forward here. --Yamla (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Yamla I feel as though my conduct hasn't been properly explained to me. I waited 6 months, but you said to do it again, so I did, but now you've said that I haven't completed WP:SO and I'm confused. Please tell me what I've done in that time that has been against the guidelines. I sincerely want to follow the rules from now on, because this block is hindering my and my family's ability to contribute in a positive way to the encyclopedia. For example, I recently saw an article in which "Supertramp" was not capitalized. I would like to be able to fix these things, and I no longer understand why my account seems so abusive. CrapNougat (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * last edited on 2021-12-01. That account is tied to this account and is well within the six month window. Additionally, it engaged in vandalism, counting against you in any future unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This makes it confusing, because I know as a fact that I never created, logged in to, or used that account, and I did not know of its existence or its edits. I was initially confused when Drmies brought it up. I know I wasn't using Wikipedia in December and after looking at that user's "contribution" I don't think I've ever even seen that page before. Could this be looked into? CrapNougat (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Two of us have looked into this. It might not be you, but given they deliberately harmed Wikipedia in the same sort of way that you deliberately harmed Wikipedia and given that you've previously lied about completing WP:SO, I'm afraid the balance of evidence is very, very firmly against you. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * How did I previously lie about WP:SO? I'm still confused in this regard. As I have said previously, my family also uses the same IP address, and I cannot speak for what they may have edited in the time I was trying to complete the standard offer. The evidence I have to give would be that their account(s) were definitely created before mine and so far as I know have only been used to benefit Wikipedia. CrapNougat (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * In that case, your family has ruined any chance of you returning. You had a pretty slim chance of returning anyway, given your attempts to harm the project. I'm done here, I won't respond further so don't bother pinging me. --Yamla (talk) 13:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)