User talk:CrashAdams

Welcome

 * }

Edit summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. —  Spike Toronto  06:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intrinsic (band)


A tag has been placed on Intrinsic (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Feezo (Talk) 07:18, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intrinsic (Band)


A tag has been placed on Intrinsic (Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 17:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intrinsic (band)


A tag has been placed on Intrinsic (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intrinsic (band)


A tag has been placed on Intrinsic (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The edit summary "I created this page AGAIN, and will continue creating this page if it keeps getting deleted" leads me to give you only one warning. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:23, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Intrinsic (band). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

CrashAdams Response
Yes I understand this, but you just can't keep deleting my page just because you feel like it. It isn't fair to me or any other user on Wikipedia to try to make a page on a LEGITIMATE band and have it deleted. I keep recreating the Intrinsic (band) page because it has a purpose, and a meaning. They are a real band and deserve a spot in the Wikipedia world of encyclopedia because they exist. --CrashAdams (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No, not every band that exists deserves to be on wikipedia. And your repeatedly creating the article could get you blocked. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

--Okay, then you may as well block me because I would rather be blocked then be part of a website that poses as an encyclopedia when in reality, it's just a fraud. Thank you for allowing me to create one page and continually deleting that page.
 * Read WP:BAND. If you can show that the group meets the criteria, and you can bring relevant sources, it shouldn't be a problem. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And while you have added a number of references, blogs are regularily not regarded reliable sources to establish the notability of a band. We need established webzines or even better non-local print media to report about a band in order to have an article. De728631 (talk) 22:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)