User talk:Crashdoom/Archives/November (2012)

There has been a mistake!
Hi , I feel that your recent edit/revert/warning on the article/against the user Article/Username has been made in error for the following reason(s): I request, with the understanding of the Wikipedia Editing Policy, my report being correct and the action taken being made in error, that any action against the user/article specified is rescinded by yourself upon receipt of this notice.
 * Wye Valley are a premier dance school, this is not unsourced content

Bruno Russell (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Bruno Russell. If this is in the context of the Wye Valley School article, your recent edits have been more in the context of good-faith edits but continually include unsourced content and cause deterioration of the article formatting. If you wish to test edits before updating pages please use a WP:SANDBOX. + Crashdoom  Talk 11:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

OK Bruno Russell (talk) 11:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Reference for that information located - with a reliable source. Bruno Russell (talk) 11:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi again Bruno Russell, using the school as a source in its own article does not conform with the verifiability policy located at WP:VERIFY and also displays a conflict of interest in terms of the neutrality of the source. In a nutshell, you need to provide an external secondary source such as the awarding body involved. + Crashdoom  Talk 12:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Well Crashdoom, the information from the school website, was referenced there again from another source - the global rock co-operation itself. Bruno Russell (talk) 13:03, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Wye Valley School. Valid references were already made for content you were challenging. If you disagree with this, feel free to talk to me on my talk page. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see [ this revision] for the unsourced content. + Bruno Russell  Talk 13:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC).
 * Please do not post false warnings on my talk page without basis for the accusations. This is harassment and may be grounds for a block or other administrative sanction as seen fit by the community. + Crashdoom  Talk 13:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

No edit warring
Hi. You left me a message about edit warring that seems to be based on a mistake. I made about 25 edits to the Golan Heights article throughout the day which involved copyediting, reordering paragraphs and rearranging photos. An editor removed two photos on the grounds that there were "too many synagogue pictures." I restored two and removed a third, in response to the claim that "three" are too many. All my edits were clearly explained in the edit summary. In what way is this edit warring? Nobody else was working on the page and I was not fighting with anyone.--Geewhiz (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, you mistook the point of my message, I am simply informing you that you were reported by another editor on the administrators' noticeboard for edit warring located at WP:AN3. + Crashdoom  Talk 16:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)