User talk:Cravaack

March 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chip Cravaack, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd  (talk)  16:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Chip Cravaack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I asked to be unblocked.... I am adding content to the page of a personal historical nature... case in point, I believe I know my personal birthdate which is published incorrectly. Cravaack (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Cravaack. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Chip Cravaack, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Please reference above. Cravaack (talk) 16:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I request to be unblocked because I am attempting to provided historical perspective from a primary source and correct inaccuracies such as incorrect birthdate and current occupation Cravaack (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Guidance for subjects of articles
Please see FAQ/Article subjects. Schazjmd  (talk)  16:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)