User talk:Cravenmath

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 06:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Deadman137, I want to know why you identify my factual edits as nonconstructive. They were both just updates of a situation that had recently happened, and I reflected that in the edits made. Sure, the formatting on one of them was not good, but I don't understand why the edits were outright rejected. Do I have to provide links of proof when making even simple changes like the ones I suggested for them to be published? They are substantial facts, and they belong on the page now given that they're official. I'm trying to help this page be as accurate and insightful as possible, so please give me some insight into the situation so that I can add the information I have been intending to add. Thanks. Cravenmath (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You might be trying to help but you did miss this "NOTE: Please do not update this table until the end of the current NHL season *not* when a team becomes 'mathematically' eliminated. This will ensure that all the teams are updated at the same time. Wikipedia's purpose is not to provide up-to-the-minute statistics." That is why your edits were removed, this policy was enacted to reduce errors and it works very well. This place has a steep learning curve, the key is to make a mistake once and then learn from it so you don't repeat it. Deadman137 (talk) 15:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)