User talk:Crawfishboil


 * PS: The usenet is not a reliable source - it is too easy to falsify posts. See reliable sources. Thanks, -Will Beback 06:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

The Usenet posts I used are from people with known IDs who post on a moderated Civil War discussion. They are used in a paragraph that is specifically about events happening on Usenet. The spirit of the NON-RULE guideline is to prohibit Usenet from being used as a source for factual claims about something unrelated to Usenet. Which is not the case here. Will_Beback is simply using this as an excuse to remove something that he does not dispute is factual from the Ed Sebesta article and also from Neo-Confederate. It's as if he's covering for Ed Sebesta cause he only removes criticisms. - Crawfishboil

3RR
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -Will Beback 00:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the "warning" or whatever that was bud, but currently you came closer to violating that rule before I did and you've also been equally unproductive - & probably more since you remove anything critical of your pal Ed Sebesta for the most pedantic reasons possible. You do it no matter how true it is and you won't even discuss whether it is true when I ask you.

1. 2. 3.

So quit being a hypocrite and quit trying to censor all these articles. Crawfishboil

Oh and one more thing where you're a hypocrite. How many times have you kept undoing MY edits without discussing them first, Will_Beback? How many? The moment I touched your precious Edward Sebesta article you undid it all and censored my new stuff twice again (which means you also reverted three times on February 1st. And ya didn't see fit to threaten yourself with blocking back then either, did ya?). Practice what you preach, buddy. Practice what you preach, cause you ain't doin it right now. - Crawfishboil


 * We give warnings to be polite and to try to ward off edit warring. You can take it in good faith, or be belligerent. the choice is yours. Cheers, -Will Beback 04:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Just like you censor in good faith, right? You've been trying to stop my edits about your friend ever since I made them and using every tactic and rule you can dig up. You know exactly what you're doing. Threatening somebody with a block isn't any less of a threat because you said "please" first. Acts of hostility shrouded in phony politeness are condescending, and it's hypocritical since you don't see fit to restrain yourself from doing the exact same things you're lecturing me about. You can crap in a bowl and call it ice cream all you want, but it will still stink. - Crawfishboil