User talk:Crayfishvictoria

August 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Coalition for Marriage, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ツ Jenova  20  (email) 11:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Coalition for Marriage, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ツ Jenova  20  (email) 15:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Poll OR
52 is a higher number than 45, this is basic maths. If you wish to dispute it then you need a citation to that effect since you are pushing WP:Original Research and this is disruptive, just as blanking sections is. Do not continue disrupting the article to make a point ツ Jenova  20  (email) 15:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Coalition for Marriage. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Consider contributing to the talk page discussion rather than trying to edit war. Your edit summary is not appropriate either.'' ツ Jenova  20  (email) 14:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Coalition for Marriage, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ツ Jenova  20  (email) 10:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism and ownership
Please stop the vandalism to the Coalition for Marriage article and contribute to the discussions on the talk page for any issues. Revert warring and misleadingly tagging controversial edits as minor is bad for the article and your presence is becoming very disruptive. If you revert once and refuse once more without discussion i will report this to WP:AIV since you are disrupting the article and ignoring constructive discussion and consensus. Thanks ツ Jenova  20  (email) 11:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Coalition for Marriage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Alexf(talk) 12:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)