User talk:CrazyBoy826/Archive 2

Possible vandal for Steampunk article
First, thank you for your work in reducing vandalism. Unfortunately, however, I shared information about my recent edit in a overly public place where I now have a personal enemy and I believe the recent blanking you reverted - which they blanked again - could possibly be, wholly, for personal vendetta. (I apologize for the trouble) As you can see the beginning of the section is primarily about an up-and-coming young female physicist who was quite proud of the new section. (https://twitter.com/nicoleyh11/status/1256729969419485185) However the anon user states in their subsequent blanking it's about a "single fellow" when it's clearly not. They also question references so please feel free to investigate their claim and think you'll find it completely unfounded. I have now restored the content again. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.80.20.117) Unfortunately, they may come to vandalize the page again because the wounds are still fresh on this personal matter. Thanks so much for your help and your patience. Nemesis75 (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I will deal with it. Make sure to leave new messages at the bottom of the page next time.  Crazy Boy  826  15:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 17:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit delete
Why did you delete my edit on Polavaram, Krishna district? I don't understand why you would do that. It is very notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:F10F:FD00:D13B:3CCD:635:980C (talk)
 * That edit was definitely unsourced and false, as forbidding water is forbidden. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Web link
Hello, i wanted to add a web link to the references at the bottom of the page for R&D tax credit. I think i made a mistake in doing so. Is it ok for me to add a web link? The web link will help companies understand the claim process. the web link is http://rdt-active.co.uk/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.199.57 (talk) 23:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You can add an external link at the bottom of the page in the External links section, or you can use a reference. CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 19:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

RedWarn
Greetings! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed for the fastest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!). If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn page for installation instructions. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 (talk) 21:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

"User:XFDcloser" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect User:XFDcloser. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 03:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

"User:Soumyabrata" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect User:Soumyabrata. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 11:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Please allow edits
Hello! Thank you for creating this page, we really appreciate it. I am the grand daughter of Mr. P.T Reddy updating details based on facts a published book. Can you please allow out edits to be published for the following page -  Pakhal_Tirumal_Reddy

Thank you!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saras Reddy (talk • contribs) 19:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the page is not protected and you can edit it. CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 19:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: First Five Years Fund
Hello CrazyBoy826. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of First Five Years Fund, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Author has not requested deletion, or other users have added substantial content. Thank you. Ged UK  14:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

CrazyBoy826
I have a question.. Why Do You Delete Peoples Edits? Answer By Edit CrazyBoy826
 * I reverted them because they were not constructive. CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 16:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oversimplified


A tag has been placed on Oversimplified requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Slatersteven (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Here is the AFD discussion [], why did you recreate this?Slatersteven (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Ohh and the nomination you removed was not a duplicate one.Slatersteven (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

My Wiki, Im Devin Lucien
Id like you to take the other leagues besides the NFL off of my wiki. This is my profile about me. I should have 100 percent influence on what is on my wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.133.29.15 (talk)
 * You do not. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Again, read policy pages
Your signature is produced by a template which is prohibited. Please change that immediately. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 22:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 23:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Rest in peace the signature. 😢 --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 06:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi, please remember to check the page history before you tag a page for speedy deletion. There may be a good version of the article in the history, in which case the page should in 99% of cases be reverted to this. It doesn't matter whether you're using Twinkle or another tool to tag the page or doing it through a normal manual Wikipedia edit. Note also that it seems Twinkle posts a message notifying of the speedy deletion tag on the talk page of the original creator, who may not be the same person who vandalised away the content. — Smjg (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geography of British Columbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abbotsford ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Geography_of_British_Columbia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Geography_of_British_Columbia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Green precipitation in Inverness
Apologies for my reversion of your edit to Inverness - I hastily interpreted it as frivolous and didn't check whether precipitation was a valid parameter for the template. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 09:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK.  Crazy Boy  826  15:57, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Come On Rain
Is there a reason you undid my redirects of The Hunger (Steve Holy song) and Come On Rain? Neither meets WP:NSONGS due to lack of sourcing, and per that notability guideline, it's acceptable to redirect to the album or artist. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

See WP:RELIST
A third relist should be avoided unless there is a good reason to do so specified in the relisting comment. Please refrain from administrative endeavours until you have got the hang of the process. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 00:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK. CrazyBoy826 (talk &#124; contribs) 01:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Stop relisting please until you are experienced in RfDs. It's better to simply comment than do an administrative action and comment if you are not an admin. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 04:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I relisted several more without consensuses for 1st and 2nd times and one for a 3rd time with a relisting comment.  Crazy Boy  826  21:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It would be far better if you commented on the discussion rather than relisting it due to your inexperience in the area. See WP:RELISTBIAS. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, this had a fair consensus to delete an definitely shouldn't be relisted by a non-admin such as yourself. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Seconding the above, several of the relists you performed today should have been simply left for an admin to close. signed,Rosguill talk 21:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That only had a comment and one delete vote.  Crazy Boy  826  21:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * See RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete. Again, please stop relisting until you have familiarised yourself with the process – you clearly haven't done that yet. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 21:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * For RfD, that is often enough of a quorum to justify deletion. In the rare case where it isn't, an admin should make that call. signed,Rosguill talk 21:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK.  Crazy Boy  826  21:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * For the last time, stop relisting and definitely don't relist discussions with unanimous consensus – doing so is contrary to RGUIDE. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 01:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Regarding this relisting, please note that for WP:CFD the same applies as for WP:RFD: don't perform administrative actions until you have built at least a few months of experience while actively participating in the process as a discussant. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

DannyS712 bot I
Hello. I have blocked, the doppelganger account you created, as asked an administrator to block the account at WP:UAA. When creating doppelganger accounts for other users it is a good idea to add doppelganger-other to the userpage of the doppelganger account. This ensures that it is clear to everybody that the account is a legitimate doppelganger account, and also it is clear who created the account. It is also best to first ask the Wikipedian if they want doppelganger account(s) created, or if you have created the doppelganger account(s), to notify them about this. This ensures there is no confusion, allows the user to create the account themselves if they want and ensures that the account is only created if they want it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK.  Crazy Boy  826  22:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks!  Crazy Boy  826  22:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. --Stay safe, ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Fredy Cedeno
Hi my name is fredy cedeno, i would like to add some missing information about my profile, please fell free to contact me.

Regards

Fredy Cedeno — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredy Cedeno (talk • contribs) 22:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * see this.  Crazy Boy  826  22:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the info I already sent a message to Biographies of living persons, I hope my profile can be updated, thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredy Cedeno (talk • contribs) 22:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Help
Can you please explain to me what is and is not vandalism? L&#39; Hiver Indien - Baloji (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * See WP:Vandalism and WP:5P.  Crazy Boy  826  20:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you. I'll take a look. L&#39; Hiver Indien - Baloji (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Albert Zwaveling
Good evening,

I edited and added the text on Albert Zwaveling on his own request. I am his son. As you will understand his personal history cannot be substantiated by citations.

Kind regards, Sander Zwaveling — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.84.133.178 (talk) 21:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's the afternoon for me. However, we will not know if the information is true if there are no citations. See WP:V and WP:COI because you seem to have a connection with the article.  Crazy Boy  826  21:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

My father wrote his memoirs in 2010. All the information can be found there. Will that be sufficient? Sander Zwaveling, 27 May 2020 86.84.133.178 (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That is mostly sufficient, but it is a WP:Primary source. WP:Secondary sources are recommended over primary sources.  Crazy Boy  826  17:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Problem with an editor
Hello, I currently have a problem with the User talk:62.248.185.87 editor on the Deep Learning Super Sampling article. He keeps stating that the article is an advert I wrote (maybe he thinks that I'm working for Nvidia). He seems to think that the article contradicts itself and put tags about it, but he do not propose anything to improve it. He keeps in this non-constructive attitude whatever improvement I try to add on the article. What is the appropriate way to deal with this kind of problem in your opinion? He is also removing parts which are backed by sources because in his opinion they are not true. For example, all the part about DLSS 2.0 performance was removed. I'm totally OK when editors try to improve articles quality, because this is the normal way wikipedia works, but his behavior looks like a kind of vandalism to me. He wanted the article to be deleted from the beginning. Hervegirod (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * For this problem, the source does contradict itself (correct me if I'm wrong). Keep the maintenance tags unless another editor is sure the problem is solved. For WP:COI, if you do have a conflict of interest, you must declare it, but if you don't, just say so and nothing bad will happen.  Crazy Boy  826  00:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, CrazyBoy826 I don't have any conflict of interest as I'm not working on this area at all (my work area is aeronautics), beside I have more than 14000 edits with a registered account on a lot of subjects (the articles I created are listed on my page), whereas this other editor don't have a registered account and only made inflammatory remarks on this article (in fact it's the only thing he did for the moment, besides removing parts of this same article because he was not happy about it).


 * I'm starting to think that he is the one who has a conflict of interest in this area. Besides, User talk:62.248.185.87 is extremely aggressive towards me since his first edit. The first thing he wrote on the talk page (and the second on Wikipedia, except if his account is a sock puppet) is: "Article is self-contradictory, lacks verifiability, uses vague, non-descriptive language and is written like an advertisement". It looks like an insult to me, and he has not stopped to use this kind of language in the article talk page. I tried to improve the article at the beginning but: first it was never enough for him, second he did not participate in any way except by throwing trash at what I tried. When I asked for advice on any proposal from him, he did not answer. But it was OK for him to write on the talk page that I wrote nonsense after I edited the article. I'm not editing on Wikipedia to be insulted by complete strangers.


 * His last remark is "These repeated baseless accusations while refusing to read or address edit summaries is not even remotely close to good faith participation". It is funny to write something like that for an editor whose only edits are on the talk page of this same article to explain that what I wrote is either baseless or is an advert, or removing parts of the article itself.


 * BTW if you go on Google for "Deep Learning Super Sampling" it returns 9,570,000 results, which is precisely the reason why I tried to write this article, it currently seems to be a very hot technology topic about video games, which is the reason why so many sources are writing about it. Hervegirod (talk) 22:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello CrazyBoy826, I think that the behavior of this editor is going out of hand, so I posted on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about this problem. Have a good day. Hervegirod (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK.  Crazy Boy  826  23:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Whataboutism
You are up to 5RR now. Please self-revert. PackMecEng (talk) 16:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * See this. Not having sources in the lead and saying "they are in the body" can lead to confusion. If there are no sources present on the text, it's easy to think it's unsourced.  Crazy Boy  826  16:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The section you are looking for is Whataboutism, the citations are there. Again, please self revert before this goes to WP:AN3. PackMecEng (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reverting. I know it is kind of a weird situation. That sentence has been back and forth a ton of times and I am hoping by cleaning it up people will start to leave it alone. It is unlikely but I can dream! PackMecEng (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

EIA
Deletion accidental. Will be editing again with proper sources.

Interesting to see monopoly by users in Wiki pages utilizing outdated sources and not allowing owners of said sources to edit. 19DMGR (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * There were good and up to date sources. See WP:V.  Crazy Boy  826  20:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

https://www.benning.army.mil/Armor/content/pdf/Armor%20School%20Spring%202020%20Thunderbolt%20Blast.pdf.

See changes in TB Blast 19DMGR (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:Be bold. Instead of tagging and asking others to do it, do it yourself. I have a lot of other things to do right now and have little time.  Crazy Boy  826  21:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

 19DMGR (talk) 21:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 19DMGR, Cite your source(s) with your edited additions/subtractions (i.e. prove it as you do it), such as the one you highlight above, otherwise we have to trust your word and that's not how Wikipedia works. --McChizzle (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough 19DMGR (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 19DMGR, Since you have found a good source, go back and made your edits and cite that source (examples on how to do that are already in the article); citing it hear does not make it "a done deal." If you want someone else to do your edit for you, I personally will not touch that particular information until June 1st when it goes into affect.  Stay say and healthy. --McChizzle (talk) 23:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blôdome


A tag has been placed on Blôdome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed,Rosguill talk 20:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

"when the looting starts the shooting starts"
The IP editor was apparently correct - and he/she produced a citation to that effect. I think we may have been mistaken. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with BrxBrx ) 02:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay.  Crazy Boy  826  02:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Withdrawing RfD discussions
Just so you know, it's out of process to withdraw an XfD discussion if anyone other than you has voted delete. In this case, because consensus was pretty clear and the redirect is receiving a lot of traffic, I don't think it would do any good to revert your close personally, but if a delete voter requests that you revert you probably should. Mostly just letting you know for future discussions down the road. signed,Rosguill talk 19:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK.  Crazy Boy  826  19:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Oe'r the gloomy hills of darkness
You have accused me of entering an edit war because I restored my edit of the entry on 'Oe'r the gloomy hills of darkness'. All I did was to give a reasonable explanation of the changes I had made to the person who had deleted them, and then restored my edit. To ensure the accuracy of my changes, all you need to do is refer to the article in the volume edited by Kirk, which is referenced in the entry on Wikipedia, as whoever wrote that section of the entry in Wikipedia totally misread that article! Without those changes the Wikipedia entry is very misleading and inaccurate in a number of ways, not least in its claim that the hymn was originally written in Welsh. As I explained to the person that deleted my revisions, the hymns was first published in English in 1772 and translated into Welsh by the hymn-writer's son in the 1790s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.192.129 (talk)
 * Your addition was unsourced - see WP:V. The original version was sourced and is verified. We cannot verify if your information is true without citation.  Crazy Boy  826  23:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

It is not correct that my additions are unsourced. I was correcting the information in the entry from the source that was cited there, i.e, from the source in footnote 4 (Kirk). I have access to that volume, and the first paragraph under 'History', which is based on the information in that volume, is full of errors, as whoever wrote that paragraph had not read the relevant section of the book correctly. To give some examples: the George Bowen mentioned was not the missionary (as the link suggests), but the squire of Llwyn-gwair Manor; he was not converted by hearing a hymn being sung (it was his son who was converted thus), and George Bowen did not visit Llwyn-gwair Manor for a Methodist meeting, he lived there! Williams was his guest there when he is supposed to have writing the hymn. All this is information is in the 'Kirk' source cited in footnote 4, and is totally at odds with what is in the present Wikipedia entry, which purports to be using that source.

Incidentally, there is a typo in that paragraph: Carn Igli should read Carn Ingli.

The final sentence in that paragraph, which states that the hymn was first written in Welsh quotes a different source (footnote 5), but that source is not correct in saying that the hymns was first written. If you need a source, you can refer to the volume in which the hymn was first published in 1772, a digitised copy of which is on the National Library of Wales website (the hymn is on pages 33-34): https://viewer.library.wales/4774514#?c=&m=&s=&cv=35&manifest=https%3A%2F%2Fdamsssl.llgc.org.uk%2Fiiif%2F2.0%2F4774514%2Fmanifest.json&xywh=-324%2C0%2C2639%2C2767 Williams Pantycelyn was totally fluent in English, as witnessed for example by the fact that the volume of English hymns of 1772 referred to above was his second volume of English hymns. Rather than being translated from Welsh to English, the hymn 'Oe'r the gloomy hills of darkness' was written first in English for the 1772 volume, and was translated into Welsh ('Dros y bryniau tywyll niwlog') by Williams's son, John, some 20 years later.

I hope the above demonstrates that the relevant paragraph in the 'History' section of the Wikipedia entry is inaccurate and in dire need of revising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.192.129 (talk) 01:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I will look at the sources as soon as possible. Please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~ at the end so we know who wrote the comment.  Crazy Boy  826  02:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)