User talk:Crazydude1912

Welcome!
Hello, Crazydude1912, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Standard WikiProjectAlbania Invitation
Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Battle of Belaćevac Mine
You wrote that a part doesn't appear in bibliography. Could you maybe link Judah (2008), so I can verify it too? It is a better way to do things via this process. Thank you.--Maleschreiber (talk) 22:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, i'm sorry for responding so late. In the revert I did i was talking about this book and not a book released in 2008. I can't see any reference linked up with any book released by Tim Judah in 2008. Please tell me if i'm overlooking something here. If the book citation "Judah, pp. x, 127–30" is reffering to the book released in 2002 then i can confirm that the part i reverted is not mentioned in the pages 127-130. I hope you can verify it yourself through this link. Crazydude1912 (talk) 17:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You're right, it's my mistake - it was published in 2002. I can't verify it but you could place that comment in the talkpage and if nobody responds with a different reading of the content of Judah via a full quote, then you can safely remove the content in a couple of days. In the meantime, you could use tags like or  to address the issue of possible misplaced content for the readers. I'm not saying that this is the only "proper" procedure that can be followed, but that it is a procedure which frames the discussion within the boundaries of policies like WP:OR and means that if someone tries to reintroduce the same content without sources, there will be no edit-warring because admin oversight can be very quick in these instances - which in turns means that nobody has to face the same issue every few days.--Maleschreiber (talk) 22:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank You. Not just for that but for all the work you're doing. Crazydude1912 (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)