User talk:Crazynas/October2011

Please comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Spain
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Coat of arms of Spain. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Be more careful
My edit was not vandalism. My edit did re-format someone else's vandalism on a talk page, but that was to distinguish it from my own heading on a talk page. This opinion is shared by the owner of the talk page, as he left my edits in-tact (save for giving the other user his own heading). Please be more careful when issuing warnings. Also, please consider reverting my warning level, as an increase was not justified. 76.119.75.131 (talk) 09:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

By the way, what's up with whenever someone with admin-powers seeing an edit made by an IP user, they assume it must be vandalism? I thought Wiki admins were supposed to be welcoming? 76.119.75.131 (talk) 09:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm not an admin, I just don't like people that think it's funny or fun or good to add dis(mis)information to one of the top websites on the planet, get away with it. Now I'm not saying you did that, but lots of people do, and it happens. Now sometimes those of us that try to help out with this make a mistake or the software bugs out or something that really really looks like vandalism isn't. So, sorry if you're offended I know I wasn't when I got reverted by the same person... Crazynast 10:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Not offended at all, just with the bump in warning level, it kind of makes things tough for me around here now. 76.119.75.131 (talk) 10:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * As the only reasonable mod I've run into around here today - Why are mods here so eager to increase people's warning level without due diligence into the situation? 76.119.75.131 (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It has to do with huggle I think, and the fact that it's considered impolite to revert someone without letting them know. Think of it this way, would you rather I didn't tell you that I reverted something you did, 20 seconds after you did it.  Warnings are also it is true a way to gauge weather and editor has been a useful contributor to the project, but it's really about the edits you make to project space.  Follow the five pillars and you'll be fine.  But why not register?  It's simple free and anonymous and I wouldn't know what US state you're in right now.  Also I'm not a mod, or anything like that, just another editor that's been around for a bit. Crazynast

The Signpost: 10 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ejaculation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ejaculation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

To answer your question...
Hi there. I watchlist Template:Vandalism information, so I just happened to see this edit summary. To answer your question, it's because it's based off the DEFCON levels. The system was originally known as "WikiDefcon", actually. Anyway...there you have it. :p Regards,  Swarm   12:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I remember the def-con system. My question was more in relation to the template design.  I just went back and looked, must have been more tired then I thought when I changed it last night... for some reason I had it in my head that you put in a '2' to make it 'defcon 4'(although I changed the template appropriately). Crazynast 16:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dana Tyler
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dana Tyler. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Men's rights
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Men's rights. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2000
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2000. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Lists of people by nationality
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Lists of people by nationality. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)