User talk:Crazynas/verifiability rfc

Crazynas... I am curious... why is my "initial proposer" comment (the first one on the page) grouped under "Unqualified", and not under "As compromise"... The entire point of my comment was that I saw the proposal as being a compromise. The same could apply to North's comment that follows it. Blueboar (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Reading through what I did (note that the last edit I made to the page was December 9th) and I realize there were several things I did incorrectly. I'm not convinced if, as compromise is a useful sub-category for support votes (as to how we analyze this RfC).  That said, I think my reasoning at the time was unqualified was the secret uncatagorized  leave it for later category... (which may have been why you and North (along with Fram for example) got stuck in the unqualified section).  In any case feel free refactor as you feel is necessary, doing this all by my self first is a lot of work and second will be seen as having bias if I'm the only editor performing the analysis, I think the closing administrators gave me a good head start with there closing statements, but there is still a long way to go.  Crazynast 04:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * thanks. Blueboar (talk) 12:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)