User talk:Crazytrain77

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ben Cannon has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogkyuhxenna, http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogkyuhxenna (redirect from http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogkyuhxenna)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello and welcome!
Hi there, neighbor (well I'm guessing, anyway, based on the pages you've edited.)

Glad to see you contributing. I did remove the paragraph about the beer tax from the Ben Cannon article; it has no citations to reliable sources, and it's also likely too much emphasis on one piece of legislation among many. Let me know if you have any questions. Hopefully you want to continue working on the article, it could use some expansion! -Pete (talk) 19:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)