User talk:Crbrurris21/Table mountain pine

Peer Review 1
1.    First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

This article has a lot of good info and citations. Especially in the morphology section. I do also like how you have lots of deferent subsections that add lots of substance to the article.

2.    What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

There are few improvements you could make. First I would find a better way to layout the Taxonomy part of the article. This would make it easer to read and you could add the full Taxonomy. Secondly, I would suggest you add some sort of map for the distribution section. This would add a visual for the reader and add to the word count with a citation. Lastly, I would fix the minor grammar mistakes. This would make the article have a better flow you could probably throw the sections into Grammarly.

3.    What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

The most important thing would be fixing the layout and adding more for the Taxonomy part.

4.    Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

I will add some of the subsections you have added so i can hit that word count!!!! Gillylax (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)