User talk:Cre8ifs/sandbox

Dave's Peer Review
While there isn't currently a lot to review in Dave's sandbox for his chosen article, I have reviewed the chosen article. I think that he has has picked a strong topic to basically create an article on since there is a page on the chemical, but nothing in it. His review of the article is strong in the sense of the information about the topic. Since he is working on a blank article he has a lot of freedom of what can be written in it so I believe he's onto a good start. I think that Dave could use another source to add some more details about, have you had a chance to look for some more?

Going off of his article selection edit, the information is very neutrally stated as it seems factual. After going into the references they seem legit and his information is not copied word for word into his notes from them all, which is good. If you're looking into making a lead section, I think it would be beneficial to obviously say what the chemical is, but mention what is is in and can be potentially used for, and as well as its discovery. I'm not sure how into depth you are going to be able to get into with the time limit of this course, but have you thought of potential sections you wanted to specifically add to this article?

Kristenforehand (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

response to student review
Kristen,

The reason there was nothing in the article whose link you checked is because I created it new.

Thank you for your suggestions: 1. expand the lead section to include "what it is", "what it's in" and uses, 2. add other sections 3. add more references

I did some of this today and will continue again tomorrow.

By the way, I changed the article title

Dave Cre8ifs (talk) 00:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)