User talk:Creador de Mundos

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Hello, Creador de Mundos, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes ( ~ ); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Viriathus (Second Punic War)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Viriathus (Second Punic War).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercenaries of the ancient Iberian peninsula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mercenaries_of_the_ancient_Iberian_peninsula check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mercenaries_of_the_ancient_Iberian_peninsula?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ambush, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (Hohum @ ) 13:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Catharism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kiri-sute gomen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kiri-sute_gomen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kiri-sute_gomen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lo Boièr
Hello, Creador de Mundos,

Thank you for creating Lo Boièr.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"

Happy International Volunteer Day. Every Wikipedians are volunteers and you deserve this recognition. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Abishe (talk) 04:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Creador de Mundos, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Samyaza have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Karura Mau moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Karura Mau, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karura Mau has been accepted
 Karura Mau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Karura_Mau help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! SL93 (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

A Voz dos Deuses moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, A Voz dos Deuses, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Not just for verification purposes, but also to establish that it passes notability criteria. See WP:NBOOK. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Alert
Orientls (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Misleading edit summary and WP:DE
Your restoration on this edit used a misleading edit summary and misrepresented sources. The removal was well explained.

To repeat, one source you have used is Cambridge scholars, which is unreliable, while other source only debunks the claims you are adding.

Be careful with reading the sources. Orientls (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Voz dos Deuses has been accepted
 A Voz dos Deuses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=A_Voz_dos_Deuses help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! 2pou (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Mediación en un artículo
Hola, me veo obligado a pedirte tu intervención en un asunto, ya que que este usuario, Asqueladd, ha recuperado una edición antigua en el artículo de Elvira Roca Barea que ya había sido revertida por varios usuarios por buenas razones, pero ahora en la versión en inglés, esperando que ahí pase más desapercibida por los lectores y editores de habla hispana. Se trata de un cambio en el que reemplaza el hecho de que un manifiesto a favor de la libertad para hablar y escribir sobre historia fuera firmado por muchas personalidades de diferentes ámbitos e ideologías, para añadir la irrelevancia de que dicho manifiesto fue difundido por la Fundación Francisco Franco, dejando caer así la idea de que los firmantes, y por tanto la escritora, son afines, o al menos tolerantes, con el franquismo.

El usuario es perfectamente consciente de esto, pues viendo su historial en otros artículos sobre organizaciones y personas que tratan temas de este tipo, tiene tendencia a añadir prefijos hiperbólicos (como "ultra") a prácticamente todo lo que sea conservador o simplemente cuestione la narrativa instalada por el lado opuesto del debate, y lo justifica añadiendo las "fuentes" que le convienen, sin importar lo sesgadas o irrelevantes que sean, lo cual no deja más opción a estas alturas que pensar que actúa de mala fe. Añade todas las opiniones posibles de las personas y medios más furibundamente críticas con algo (en una suerte de falacia ad populum), por irracionales y viscerales que sean, y su justificación siempre es que son gente que sabe (falacia ad baculum, los famosos autoproclamados "expertos en extrema derecha", que por cierto, ha editado bastante el artículo del politólogo Villacañas y casualmente olvidó mencionar el conocido hecho de que trabajó de asesor para el partido Podemos, situado por la mayoría en la izquierda radical, no vaya a ser que alguien vea que no es una persona precisamente objetiva y se le caiga el pretexto), despreciando otras valoraciones, como la de Vargas Llosa, la cual consideró más irrelevante porque "escribe ficción".

En resumidas cuentas, este usuario utiliza la wikipedia desde hace años para difamar organizaciones, personas e ideas de la forma más sutil posible, añadiendo datos poco relevantes si son dañinos y omitiendo o relegando deliberadamente otros más importantes que no le interesan, camuflando sus intenciones en sus selectivas y a menudo cuestionables fuentes, retorciendo las normas hasta el límite para escudar sus poco éticas acciones. Por ilustrarlo de forma más concisa, es como si pusiera una irrelevante caricatura obscena en el artículo de una persona y te niega que sea difamatoria diciendo "No, solo es una obra de arte, y puedo ponerla porque salió un día en un periódico y su dibujante es catedrático de artes". Espero que se haga algo al respecto, porque este tipo de usuarios hacen que cada vez más gente tome la wikipedia como algo poco serio.--91.242.154.140 (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Iba a hacerlo antes de acudir a usted, pero lamentablemente son cuentas de usuarios no fijos que se encuentran abandonadas hace tiempo, así que no he podido.--91.242.154.140 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Utagaki, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kanto and Kunimi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Creador de Mundos: Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, John B123 (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message