User talk:Created2

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  ITAQALLAH  04:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Ali Sina
Here's the thing: you cant put your own opinions in Wikipedia. You have to quote famous people and make a reference to them. The following is your own stuff and doesnt qualify to be in the page:
 * Almost all of the (lengthy) debates hardly lead a serious reader towards any substantiate conclusion. A radical hater of Islam would enjoy all the name calling and abusing of the prophet Mohammed and Islam. On the other hand a Muslim will feel agitated by the instigation due to the abuse and name calling of the prophet Mohammed. A reader, with strong probability does not see a scholarly exahange or ideas (most importantly references from which the idea originates). What a reader sees is exchange of rethoric, exchange of personal egos. Most of the arguments about the Quran are taken out of context. If somone says that Jesus preached hate and quoted the verse "an eye for an eye" most (all) Christians would not agree. Similarlly if a verse is taken out of context to prove Jews and Christians are despised in the Quran. Most (all) muslims will not agree. Click here for a good explanation http://pakistanlink.com/religion/2002/0104.html

Further, the link you gave has no mention of FFI - I dont see how its relevant. Plus Muhammed cant be called "Prophet". See the main Muhammad article. No mention of 'prophet' there. Calling people "radical hater" is your own opinion. All of your above text is not valid to be in the encylopedia. Hopefully you'll get a hang of whats valid and whats not. --Matt57 04:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Like I said, Create2, you cant put your own opinions in an article. Calling people Islam hater is incorrect, to say the least and that kind of stuff will get reverted.--Matt57 14:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

A more polite warning on reverting text.
Wikipedia has a policy called WP:3RR which is intended to help stabalise articles by stopping what is called a "edit war". It doesn't actually require 3 reverts (and a revert means undoing the actions of another editor or other editors in whole or part - and for the FFI page doing anything can be argued as a revert, "A revert may involve as little as adding or deleting a few words or even one word (or punctuation mark)", but less will do to get you blocked for a short period of time. You are a new account and so far have only edited 1 article. This in itself would not be a problem (especially if someone can add new knowledge to Wikipedia) but you have chosen the one article which has been the subject of heated debate and has only recently survived a request for deletion. Your edits have also been reverted in themselves. I'd recommend that you look around at other articles (there are millions to choose from and hundreds if not 1,000s which have an Islamic theme) and not just focus on this one article. Ttiotsw 06:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * i agree. Created2, please be sure to read WP:CIVIL as well as the introductory links provided above. if you find editing a particular article to be the source of heated debate, you may wish to concentrate on other Islam-related articles if that is your interest.  ITAQALLAH   15:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)