User talk:Createn

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orsto Ltd (January 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orsto Ltd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Orsto_Ltd Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RadioFan&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Orsto_Ltd reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leisuretime


The article Leisuretime has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not seem to meet notability guidelines; sources offered only support the existence of this company and do not indicate how it is notable or significant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 16:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Orsto Ltd. has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. ''Pages that were not created by yourelf can not be tagged as created in error. if you feel these pages meet Wikipedias criteria for speedy deletion then please tag them using one of the appropriate criteria. '' Amortias (T)(C) 16:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think what you were trying to do was to replace the article titled Orsto Ltd. with an identical article titled Orsto Ltd (no period). But we don't do that by copying the article text and pasting it into a different title. Instead, Wikipedia has a "Move" function that allows you to change the title of an article without copying, and thereby preserves the edit history of the article. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 02:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Suspected undisclosed paid editing
Hello Createn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 15:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SmartSE (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)