User talk:Creation7689/Archive 2011

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights does  n't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Iwrestledabearonce
I reverted your edit to the band, Iwrestledabearonce because checking back on the history; Backtable settled a point to just call them "heavy metal" to end the genre wars and the IP adress was only restoring what was settled by Backtable. Him and I have for months got that page together, sharing and accepting one another's ideas until finally settling on a good consensus. You could see our resolvations on the talk page for it if not weigh-in. Your choice. =) • GunMetal Angel  04:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I see that now, thanks for telling me this. I just read the talk page last night before my computer turned off. Thanks. =] Creation7689 (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Users free to remove warnings
Re this edit, please know that users are free to remove warnings from their user talk page. This has been discussed several times, and a policy to ban the practice has never reached consensus. As such, editors are free to remove warnings, but when they do so, there's a presumption that they have read them, and other editors can then follow-up with higher level warnings or reports to administrators based on the deleted warnings. The warnings are still in the page history regardless. Whether his policy makes perfect sense or not is subject to debate, but it's what we're stuck with for the moment, as numerous discussions have failed to reach any other conclusion. Thanks and happy editing! Zachlipton (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Bleh. Although I don't like that decision, ill respect it. Thanks for clarifying this. Ill keep this in mind from now on. Creation7689 (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. It's not a huge deal, and it's unlikely anyone will care in the case of obvious and persistent vandals, but it's something people occasionally get touchy about. I'm not a huge fan of the policy either, but realistically, it's probably the best option that avoids edit wars on user talk pages. Cheers. Zachlipton (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Question
I think there's no problem if somebody removes interwiki link to a page which doesn't exist. I don't understand the edit you have made after that.--Jieκeren (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I confused myself. I see what you were doing now, ill undo my edit. Creation7689 (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind. Regards--Jieκeren (talk) 21:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Reverted edit at Trans-Alaska Pipeline System
Please see Talk:Trans-Alaska_Pipeline_System. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Charter Communications IPs
You added mobileip to a Charter Communications IP. As far as I can see, Charter doesn't do mobile Internet, and in my experience so far, I have seen no or very few instances where a Charter IP is shared. Do you have some information that I don't have? --Nlu (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * After re-reading the information I used to tag the IP, I realized that I completely tagged the IP wrong. xD Im kinda new and Im just trying out some of the twinkle features I don't usually use to gain more experience editing. Ill be sure to carefully read my information next. Creation7689 (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for your anti-vandalism work.  --Nlu (talk) 18:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)