User talk:CreativeWorksLondon

July 2016
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 11:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the three important principles above. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * If you read my above notes, you will see how this occurred. The system when I clicked Talk to try and correct errors in an article, took me to a user talk page which looked like I needed to fill something in, as I mentioned I was NOT aware of these policies at that time so it will not happen again. Sorry that I am not a Wikipedia expert but if my company is being defamed I reserve the right to attempt to correct this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreativeWorksLondon (talk • contribs) 16:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you read John's post above, you will see that there are three questions that you have not answered yet. Please, take time to read the linked texts and then answer those question in detail (not just yes/no, convince us that you understand those concepts). Your answers are crucial for you to be unblocked.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

If you can't extract the intent within my earlier 2 responses, this is a 'club' I'd rather not be a part of. I am not 6 years old...childish and pedantic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.136.139 (talk) 06:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)