User talk:Creativecellar

Welcome!
Hello, Creativecellar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567467412 your edit] to Rosemary Watson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * the show, "Your Home, with Kitty Bartholomew" on (HGTV) |HGTV . She made her on-camera debut as a guest designer on the spin-off show "Ask Kitty". Other guest

Editing on behalf of a client
Hello, Creativecellar. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rosemary Watson, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Please do not continue to add the promotional material to the article as it will be reverted.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your addition of unsourced and poorly sourced material to Rosemary Watson. The content you are adding violates several Wikipedia policies regarding neutrality, sourcing, and the use of the encyclopedia to post promotional material. Accounts that disregard our policies regarding sourcing and neutrality are generally blocked, so it is imperative that you discontinue attempting to add the material as currently presented and read through the conflict of interest guidelines provided above. .--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly adding unsourced personal information to a biography article despite multiple explanations as to how the edit was contrary to Wikipedia policy. In addition, the material is very promotional in nature, which is also disallowed by the policies I explained to you above. The block is of an indefinite duration, that is you can be unblocked immediately if you can agree to abide by the conflict of interest guidelines and request changes and updates via the article talk page rather than editing the article directly. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and it is very important that you are willing to discuss your edits with others when concerns are raised, especially when dealing with our basic policies regarding verifiability and neutrality. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)