User talk:Creaturewalker

License tagging for Image:Laurie 5 larger..jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Laurie 5 larger..jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 13:07, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Todesbondenpotrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Todesbondenpotrait.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lauriees.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Lauriees.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license to license it under the GFDL, or  to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use  to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Todesbonden
This was a non-notable band as per the criteria set out in WP:Music. Perhaps Myspace would be a better location for this information. (aeropagitica) 13:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Your question in the help desk
I saw your question in the help desk, but by the time I'd typed a reply, you had deleted the question. So it doesn't go to waste, here is the answer anyway.


 * The first thing to do is get to know the Wikipedia guidelines, which here are in Notability (music). In order to challenge a deletion, you need to be able to make a strong case that the band pass at least one of the tests. The tests are simple to apply, e.g. "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart, in at least one large or medium-sized country." or "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media". If you feel there is a case, there is a method for challenging deletion, but to be sure of success I recommend discussing any questions here [on the help desk] first. Be very sure not to make a case that includes any opinion: opinions are not valued. Also, the band must not only pass the test, the article must make it clear that it does with references (not just claims). Remember that the decisions are not made by music experts but by people who read the article and apply the guidelines based only on what they read and can confirm. The presence of other non-notable bands is not a valid criterion, and anyone is free to nominate articles for deletion if they feel that the subject is not notable (by these guidelines); on a random check, while I know nothing about Rain Fell Within I cannot see anything in the article to justify keeping it. Good luck, Notinasnaid 12:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Laurie Ann Haus


A tag has been placed on Laurie Ann Haus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  15:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)