User talk:Credauth

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 01:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 12:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Kashmir Solidarity Day
The reason for the reverting of your addition to the Kashmir Solidarity Day article was included in the edit summary. It was done on the basis of a Wikipedia policy called WP:NOTNEWS. This basically says that Wikipedia isn't a news website and events should only be added to articles if they have lasting significance. In this case, you and the editor who reverted the addition have different views about whether the event you added has sufficient significance. This is called a content dispute and to resolve this you need to either discuss the matter between yourselves to see if you can come to an agreement, or (as I see you have done), open a discussion on the article's Talk page to let other interested editors express their opinions and see if a consensus can be reached.

One other thing - when editing Wikipedia you should always assume good faith amongst other editors. Just because someone disagrees with an edit you made, they aren't necessarily biased and shouldn't be accused of this on the talk page. If we all assume good faith and discuss things politely between ourselves, there's a better chance of reaching an agreement. Neiltonks (talk) 12:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Neiltonks,


 * I was curious on the part that can some senior member delete my contribution without discussing on talk page ? or is it mandatory to discuss on talk page, get consensus and then do the appropriate change ? Should we enable Page Protection so that only approved changes should be visible?


 * Regards CA Credauth (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Any editor can amend or revert any change that's made to a Wikipedia article. However to avoid edit wars (where editors repeatedly remove and re-add the same  material to an article), you should generally engage in discussion when content you add is removed, rather than just re-inserting it. Continued edit warring is disruptive and those who're involved can have their editing privileges withdrawn by an administrator. Neiltonks (talk) 13:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for joining WikiProject Pakistan
samee converse  12:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Saqib (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Saqib bro, i am totally clueless as to why you would raise a false sock request for assisting you. I don't blame you but due to this confusion, one admin Berean_Hunter has blocked me for some unknown reason. please explain to him that the content i added was of value and has been added as part of an article.


 * Dear Berean_Hunter, i think there is some confusion. you have mistakenly linked me with some one else. I request you to please check again as i don't even know the account you have associated me with.




 * when in doubt, i ask (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

I haven't received any reply from admin since last 7 days. I would humbly request you to please look in to this. Let me know for any queries to prove my acquittal in this allegation. thanks when in doubt, i ask (talk) 08:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I cannot review this as it is a checkuser block, only a checkuser can review it. They are very limited in number, and volunteers, so you will need to be patient. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * , please look into this and guide me as to why i am being considered as "likely sockpuppet". thanks when in doubt, i ask (talk) 11:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * including  |  when in doubt, i ask (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * including . i know checkusers are busy, however, i would like to request to please look into this request. Its been 8 days and no response from CU. Your expedited response will be highly appreciated. when in doubt, i ask (talk) 08:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Please don't ping random admins. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Assistance Required
Hello /  / ,

I require your assistance in sorting out a critical issue. I have recently been blocked for sockpuppetry which i have never committed.

Please assist me as to how do i prove and reach out to senior members to look into this?

Secondly, user has undid all my contribution which i did in collaboration with senior members. I would request you guys to please look into this.

Thanks

when in doubt, i ask (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:Unblock request. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This is a checkuser block(that only a checkuser can review); meaning that there is technical evidence that these accounts are related. If this is your only account, you will need to explain the other accounts and why they appear to be related when they are not. 331dot (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks Kautilya3 and 331dot,


 * I have checked the contributions of Mike Foxtrot Bravo. This person has done only one edit to an wiki article which i have never even visited till now.


 * I have also checked the 'Interaction Timeline Report' and 'User Compare Report'. I couldn't see any similarity. Rest of the options were restricted so couldn't check them.


 * Please suggest the way forward.


 * when in doubt, i ask (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * That isn't the main account involved; see Sockpuppet investigations/Liborbital. 331dot (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * thanks 331dot... i just checked the main account Liborbital. It was closed last year. There is no common page edits among us plus there is nothing in 'Interaction Timeline'. when in doubt, i ask (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * A checkuser will come along to review your request. 331dot (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Dear GAB, please guide me when in doubt, i ask (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear CU (AGK, BU, Alison, DoRD), i have no link with any other account. It is to request to please re-run CU. Thanks when in doubt, i ask (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello 331dot / GAB, My earlier request for unblock has been denied. i think i have been a victim of collateral damage. Any suggestion on way forward? when in doubt, i ask (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)