User talk:Cregy

Nathaniel coulson
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nathaniel coulson, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 19:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Help request
helpme Re the above article. The website it came from is actually managed and run by myself. Can I not include material from this website. If not what if I drop the copyright at the bottom of the site and make it a CCC licence will that help please? Thanks Cregy 14:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You need to prove that you own the copyright to the text, but even then I don't know it will help. Remember that wikipedia ideally uses content that can be freely used by anyone else, and unless your content is released into the public doman I'm not sure this qualifies. You can read WP:COPYRIGHT to get started, or better yet just re-write the article in your own words using that text as a source, which is a good technique to use for future articles too! I will leave your help me tag up because I haven't helped answer your question very well... SGGH speak! 15:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * One don't need to release things into PD. If the editor own the copyright, then as long they agree to submit the material under GFDL then it's good enough. You can either change the license on the stated website to GFDL, send premission via OTRS system, or snail mail to Wikimedia Foundation. If you do choose the first option, I'll recommend you then get an administrator to review and note that the website does indeed now list content under GFDL license and on what date, like they do with Flickr images on Commons. This way, any change of license notice on the website won't cause a problem in the future. Don't forget whichever way, you content submitted still need appropriate attribution. KTC 15:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)