User talk:Crelache/F.C. San José

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (it is a known organisation, that will soon be making money, and is known to be an upcoming channel that will become part of a large scale organisation within a few months) --Crelache (talk) 21:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * So what you're saying is that it's presently a money-losing web-zine that no one has written about. Please see WP:GNG to determine if it's actually notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * And I suppose you should read Wikipedia:Notability (web). None of the reasons given here are sufficient. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

It is not losing money as it has no assets, or liabilities. It will be making money by 2014, and has already gained the support of +4000 Australians, making it notable amongst this minority — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crelache (talk • contribs) 02:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you don't understand. It doesn't matter how many people you claim support it, as that's not a reliable source and support isn't a criteria for notability. Please read the two pages linked above and find
 * significant coverage
 * in reliable sources
 * that are independent of the subject
 * (in the words of GNG) or
 * verifiable evidence that the web content has attracted the notice of
 * reliable sources
 * unrelated to the web content
 * (in the words of Notability (web)). Your claims don't merit its inclusion. Sources do. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I will find what you've said is needed. But also, do you know how much time this page has left before deletion? I have a busy schedule these next few days, and struggling to find time for this page...but thank you for telling me what is needed :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crelache (talk • contribs) 08:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --149.135.147.23 (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

It is a proponent of equal rights for transvestites. This page is a move towards societal equality and should be protected. Transvestites 4 lyf

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (the Organisation has the support of +4000 Australians, as well as a profesional football clubs support firm) --Crelache (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)