User talk:Crequijo18/Developmental psychology

Your addition to the article is interesting. I do agree with Dr. Rahn regarding clarity of the first statement. My interpretation was that "these tools" referred to the Strange Situation Test and the Adult Attachment Interview; however, I can see other readers interpreting it differently (My interpretation may be wrong). Perhaps, after your last sentence you could elaborate on the risks and their identification. You do an excellent job at maintaining a neutral, informative tone.

Pammul (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review
Your edit adds a better description of Autism and ASD that was otherwise lacking in the article's lead section. It allows the reader to gain a better grasp of the concept before going more in depth later in the article. However, it may be beneficial to make the addition more concise. Also, you may want to add in citations for some of your statements. Overall, it seems to be a valuable addition to the article. Sey2020 (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Peer edit reviews
Thank you for your insightful feedback. I agree that expanding on my last statement does help my edit. I was able to add an example after my last sentence. Hopefully this will make my edit to my article more informative.

Also, after re-reading my edit I did realize that my choice of words was not correct. Instead of stating “tools” I changed the opening statement to my edit. Even though I state two tests, to clarify they are one similar tool used to help identify attachment issues in adults.

Crequijo18 (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)