User talk:CrescentEvi

Welcome!
Hello, CrescentEvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for Sixties Scoop feedback
It was so helpful to get your comments. I am a journalist by training and used to quoting people in the articles I write. It was a very valid point that these quotes should be cut/very limited in Wikipedia. I made that comment too in one of the articles I reviewed but had failed to apply the same standard to myself when writing. Also, I had not yet explored the linking function and that too was a great suggestion -- the article is now linked throughout to related Wikipedia pages. Lastly, the content, I had thought I might be short but not that short of the class requirement. Based on your interest in the AIM program, I considerably expanded this section as well as a few other areas and have surpassed the minimum work count. Thanks again! Davidajeanne (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Notes on "Women in Law & Development in Africa"
The article in it's first draft is already on a high level: The first paragraph summarizes WiLDAF and gives first insight in the goals and reasoning behind the organization. The article is well structured for the most part, even though "History", "Structure", "Aims and goals" and "Projects and efforts" should remain the main points, while the segment on Ghana could be incorporated into "Projects and efforts", especially regarding the collaboration with Crossroads International and thus offering the "Access to Justice Program". It would have improved the article to engage in how the media campaigns actually resulted in specific numbers in regards to violence against women. The point "structure" could have used additional information about how the organization functions in different countries with different needs, regulations and statistics. Over all a very successful first draft that could be improved more with specific numbers attached to facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximilian Brey (talk • contribs) 04:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)