User talk:Crfc4life

Copyright problems with The Eagle's Prey
Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Eagle's Prey, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, The Eagle's Prey appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Eagle's Prey has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please note that even if the copyright issue were resolved, the extract would not be suitable for an encyclopedia article - see Notability (books) for more detail. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The Eagle's Prey
I've deleted this as it was merely a copy-paste copyvio plot summary. An article needs declarative sentences describing the subject. "The Eagle's Prey  is a book by . . . ." The description should tell how the subject is notable. Mere existence is not sufficient. If there is significant coverage in reliable sources with verifiable information then it is notable. (Please see Notability (books) for more information on notability as it applies to books.) While an article should contain a plot summary, it should not be in flowery promotional language. But a plot summary is not enough for an article. The emphasis should be on the real world importance of the subject. While copyrighted work can be used to source information, you must "say it in your own wolds." Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)