User talk:Crice00

If you feel that the other Peter Woodbury deserves to be in Wikipedia you need to create a new article for him, not replace the other Peter Woodbury. You would also need to create a disambiguation page. Here is your text if you decide to create a new one. "Peter Woodbury is a firefighter in Groton, Connecticutt. He is the father of two children and three stepchildren. In 2007 he turned 40. Many people at work call him 'Woody'. He collects rocks. His other hobbies include raising cats and messing with telemarketers. Good job, Woody!" Thanks. Mpete510 21:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Woodbury history, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- intgr #%@! 23:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Woodbury history
I have added a "" template to the article Woodbury history, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Malla nox  00:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)