User talk:Cricket Datum

I am the "new look" Sinbad Barron!

I am not involved with sockpuppets and I need to be given a fair chance to edit as a human being! Please do not block me or say I am evading a ban, I can open as many accounts as I like but the truth must prevail. Before, I never knew how to exploit it, then I went travelling for 2 years and saw the world! Now I'm a changed man. Consider this when leaving me messages.

Yours

Sinbad

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Adilson Tavares Varela has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  18:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:Sinbad Barron. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ” TeLe Ş ( PT @ L C G ) 18:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Civilty
Please do not make any incivil edits in wikipedia, and things will be just fine. Can you make sure that ALL your edits are civil? --  S ulmues (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Don't you worry about the anti-Albanians. Can you contribute to Albanian articles in a positive manner without necessarily having to be incivil with the others? --  S ulmues (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * In addition, since your main account is blocked for now, although openly, you are socking. Can you draft a believable unblock request where you clearly state all of your objectives in editing in wikipedia? And also promise goodwill to behave well according to wikipedia policies, and then truly maintain those promises? All I'm saying is this: Stop using sock accounts, either openly or hiddenly, but focus exclusively in reopening your old account either by a believable unblock request or by getting the Standard Offer--  S ulmues (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Sinbad Barron for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 5 albert square (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Vlorë. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ” TeLe Ş ( PT @ L C G ) 18:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Account blocked
I have blocked this account as a sockpuppet of Sinbad Barron. Though your intentions may be good, your account is still block which means that you're not allowed to edit. Please go back to your main account and request for an unblock there. I suggest taking WP:OFFER offer first and show that you can be trusted again.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 18:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Sinbad Barron for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 22:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC)